DCIT, CIRCLE, BHILWARA vs. M/S. SUZUKI TEXTILES LTD., BHILWARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to abate the appeal proceedings until the Resolution Professional, appointed as Head of the Monitoring Committee by the NCLT, appoints an Authorized Representative to defend the case. The Revenue retains the right to proceed with recovery of demand as per law.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting certain disallowances and additions. The assessee's application before the NCLT for a resolution plan was approved with specific observations regarding pending legal proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether pending legal proceedings are abated or can continue after NCLT approval of a resolution plan, and the need for representation in such proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM:
This captioned appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ajmer dated 30.01.2028 in respect of Assessment Year 2014-15 challenging therein multiple issues, etc.
2 DCIT v. Suzuki Textiles Ltd.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“On facts and in law, the ld. CIT(A), Ajmer erred in:-
deleting the disallowance of late deposit of employee’s contribution towards PF & ESI amounting to Rs.1,91,80,121/- made by the AO u/s 36(1)(va) of the I.T. Act, 1961 without appreciating the facts of the case;
deleting the addition made on account of unsecured loans of Rs.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- R K Swamy Limited, Chennai vs DCIT Non Corporate Circle 10(1), ChennaiITA 504/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. R.K. Swamy Ltd., Chennai vs DCIT, Ncc-10(1), ChennaiITA 2822/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 838/IND/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026