ASHOK BHALCHANDRA PATIL,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 13(1), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee subsequently filed a withdrawal application seeking to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal could be withdrawn by the assessee. The withdrawal was sought on the grounds that the issues were settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune (‘CIT(A)’ for short) dated 07.02.2018 for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. When the matter had come up for hearing today, the appellant filed a letter seeking permission to withdraw the above captioned appeal on the ground that the issues involved in this appeal stand settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The appellant also filed copy of Form No.3 issued by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune-4. 2
On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of the appeal.
In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the above captioned appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 24th day of February, 2021. (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (INTURI RAMA RAO) "याियक सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक / Dated : 24th February, 2021. Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.
""यथ" / The Respondent.
The CIT(A)-10, Pune.
The Pr. CIT-4, Pune. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “बी” ब"च, 5. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026