RAMBHAU MARUTI SHINDE,JALNA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(3), JALNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2009-10. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal, stating the issue was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be permitted to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISHWANETHRA RAVI, JM
आदेश / ORDER
The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 1, Aurangabad on 11.06.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10.
Before us, the assessee filed a letter dated 15.02.2021 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the issue involved in this appeal stands settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The appellant also filed copy of Form No.3 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik – 1.
3. On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of appeal.
4. In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 11th March, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (S.S. VISHWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S. SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 11th March, 2021. Yamini आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 1, Aurangabad.
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Aurangabad. 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “बी” ब�च, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy //
Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026