NARHARI GINDODIYA,JALNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE, JALNA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 181/PUN/2020Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 April 2021AY 2011-123 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as no objection was raised by the Revenue. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee submitted a letter seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The assessee wished to settle the appeal under the VSVS Scheme and had already applied and received Form 3.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their appeal before the tribunal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘A’ PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Abhay N. Agrawal
For Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A.M. Krishanan

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1. Draft dictated on 27-04-2021 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 27-04-2021 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before JM the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →