GETVEE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the CIT(A) was incorrect in dismissing the appeal solely on the grounds of delay. The delay should have been condoned, and the appeal should have been decided on its merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to a four-month delay in filing. The assessee cited the non-availability of directors as the reason for the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal on delay without considering the merits, and if the delay should have been condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘B’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
Date of Hearing 16.01.2023 Date of Pronouncement 18.01.2023 ORDER PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM,
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT (Appeals)-18, New Delhi, dated 12.06.2019 for the Assessment Year 2015-16.
The grounds of appeal read as under:-
1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals has erred in rejecting the appeal filed before their office on account of delay in filing of appeal due to non-availability of Directors and without considering the merits of the appeal.
2. The fact is that the Learned Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Ld ACIT) has erred in adding Rs. 31,00,850/- in the total income of the assessee on account of issue of shares at more than fair market value u/s 56(2)(viib).
3. The Id. ACIT also issued notice for levy of Penalty on the above additions.
4. The incorrect addition of income as above paras has resulted in total assessed Loss of Rs.3,08,95,098/- instead of Current year Loss of Rs.3,39,95,948.
5. It seems that Ld. ACIT has not applied judicious knowledge and only acted to make unjustified additions.
6. It is contended that the Ld ACIT has failed to appreciate the facts of the case and proceeded to add Income on frivolous grounds.
3. In this case in assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, an addition was made u/s 56(2)(viib) amounting to Rs.31,00,850/-. The assessee appealed before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) only on the ground that there was four month delay in filing of appeal, dismissed the appeal.
Against this order, the assessee is in appeal before us.
We have heard the ld. DR and perused the records. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite notices. Hence, we proceed to adjudicate the issue after hearing the Ld. DR and perusing the records.
We find that the Ld. CIT(A) is not at all correct in dismissing the appeal in limine on mere delay of four months. The reason for delay submitted by the assessee was that concerned Director was not available, hence the appeal could not be file in time.
We find that the delay in this case should have been condoned by the Ld. CIT(A) and he should have decided the appeal on merits.
Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and remand the issue to the file of the Ld.
More judgments on Section 56(2)(viib)
- M/S Namdev Finvest Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-1, JaipurITA 1255/JPR/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Payswiff Technologies Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 131/HYD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Radison Estates Private Limited, Bangalore vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 519/BANG/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Income Tax Officer - 9(2)(1), Mumbai vs Coolberg Beverages Pvt Ltd, MumbaiITA 4286/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Medwell Ventures Private Limited, Delhi vs The Dy. CIT, Circle-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1775/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026