SHAKTI BHOG SNACKS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 27, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to remit all appeals to the CIT(A) for adjudication in light of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The CIT(A) is to consider all orders passed by the NCLT and superior forums.
What were the facts?
The assessee companies, M/s. Shakti Bhog Foods Limited and M/s. Shakti Bhog Snacks Limited, filed appeals against assessment orders. The assessee did not appear for hearings, and the matter was proceeded ex-parte. The Revenue submitted that the assessee company is undergoing proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the impact of the ongoing insolvency proceedings on the income tax appeals. The Tribunal needed to determine how to proceed with the appeals given the IBC proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G” DELHI
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
PER BENCH : The captioned Cross Appeals have been filed at the instance of the Assessee and the Revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXIX, New Delhi [‘CIT(A)’ in short], dated 27.11.2018 (in M/s. Shakti Bhog Foods P. Ltd.) and dated 22.10.2018 (in M/s. Shakti Bhog Snacks Ltd.) arising from the assessment orders dated 30.12.2017 and 29.12.2017 respectively passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 143(3) r.w. Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AYs 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012- 13, 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16.
When the matter was called for the hearing, none appeared for the assessee. It is seen from the record that multiple opportunities have been given to the assessee and the matter is very old, therefore, we are constraint to proceed the matter ex- parte.
The ld. CIT-DR for the Revenue indicated that the assessee company is subjected to proceedings under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and certain orders have been passed pursuant to application filed by State Bank of India on account of default in loan accounts of the corporate debtor (assessee) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 seeking initiation of corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), declaring moratorium and for appointment Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and an order dated 22.09.2022 has been passed by National Company Law Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi in and others in the matter of State Bank of India vs. Shakti Bhog Ltd., i.e., assessee herein. The ld. CIT-DR however submitted that exact positions from the proceedings are not known.
We have heard the submissions made on behalf of the Revenue. The Revenue has filed form-A being Public Announcement (Under Regulation 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India along with the order passed by the NCLT Principal Bench New Delhi giving notice of order of commencement of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the assessee vide order dated CP(IB)-24(PB)/2018 dated 22.09.2022 on account of default of loan account of the assessee under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. However, full facts are not available regarding declaration of moratorium period if any, in the matter.
6. Consequently, we consider it expedient to remit all the captioned appeals to the file of the CIT(A) for appropriate adjudication in accordance with law keeping in mind the provisions of IBC Code, 2016. For this purpose, the CIT(A) shall take into account, all orders passed by NCLT and superior forums for the purposes of passing appropriate orders.
In the result, the respective appeals of the assessee and Revenue are allowed.
Order was pronounced in the open Court on 18/01/2023.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026