VERITAS STORAGE (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the income from maintenance support and training services are intricately linked with the utilization of software and are not taxable as FTS. They also found that the 'make available' condition under Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA was not satisfied, and the revenue did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate otherwise. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision in the assessee's own case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Singapore tax resident, received income from software licenses, hardware appliances, maintenance support, training services, and education services, which it claimed as non-taxable under the India-Singapore DTAA. The Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to treat a portion of this income as Fees for Technical Services (FTS), while the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) partially agreed, considering some services as FTS. The assessee appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether income from maintenance support and training services, provided in connection with software utilization, is taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under the India-Singapore DTAA, and if the 'make available' clause is satisfied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 9(1)(vii),Section 115A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT914 citing432 ITR 471 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘D’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, AM :-
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated
2023 u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] for A.Y 2020-21. ITA No. 1913/DEL/2023 [A.Y 2020-21] Veritas Storage [Singapore] Pte Ltd Vs. The Dy. C.I.T.
The grievance of the assessee as emanating from the grounds of appeal is as under:
Ground 1-The Learned AO violates the Principle of Consistency and Judicial Discipline.
1 The learned AO grossly erred in re-characterizing the transaction in relati
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026