GARISON ENGINEER,PATHANKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), AMRITSAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals were defective and not maintainable due to the non-compliance by the assessee. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed three appeals before the ITAT, but failed to remove defects pointed out by the registry. These defects included not filing grounds of appeal, incorrect respondent details, and incomplete verification.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeals due to significant defects in the filing and non-removal of these defects by the appellant.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
These three appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi even dated 30.09.2021 in respect of Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2015- 16.
At the time of hearing, the ld. DR has submitted that the appellant assessee has not filed grounds of appeal with the Memorandum of Appeal attention of the Bench that the defects communicated vide reminder letters dated 09.03.2022 and 31.05.2022 reads as under:
Grounds of appeal
before ITAT are not filed. 2. Name of Respondent on Cause Title is not correctly filled in. 3. Respondents’ Personal information is not correctly filled in. 4. Column no 4 of appeal details is not completely filled in. 5. Power of attorney is not filed on stamp paper of Rs.350/-. 6. Tribunal fee is deposited under wrong head. 7. Form of verification is not completely filled in.
However, the appellant assessee has not yet removed the defects communicated to the appellant vide registry as above.
In view of the matter, the appeals filed by the assessee are liable to be rejected as defective appeals.
Accordingly, all these three subject appeals of the assessee are dismissed as not maintainable.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28.02.2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026