GEOMETRA INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED,SINGAPORE vs. ITO, INT. TAX-1(3)(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) considering the prevailing conditions and Supreme Court orders. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to pass a speaking order on merits after observing principles of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte due to non-attendance and a delay of 36 days. The assessee did not attend the proceedings before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and whether the CIT(A) should have passed an order on merits after observing natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHIBENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Kul BharatDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A)-42, New Delhi dated 06.08.2021 for AY 2012-13.
Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record.
We find that the case has been reopened u/s 148 of the Act and the order has been passed ex-parte owing to non attendance of the assessee during the proceedings. We find that the assessee has not attended before the ld CIT(A). Further, we also find that the ld CIT(A) has summarily dismissed the appeal of the assessee which has been filed with a delay of 36 days. Owing to the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and also the conditions of Corona prevalent at that time we hold that the delay be condoned
Geometra International Pvt Ltd and direct the ld CIT(A) to pass a speaking order on merits after duly observing the principles of natural justice.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is filed by the assessee.
Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 10/03/2023.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026