K B CONTRACTORS (PARTNERSHIP),NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-62(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 9224/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 March 2023AY 2011-125 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the AO should not have completely discredited the assessee's case based solely on the non-production of books, especially when previous years' profit margins were significantly lower. The case was restored to the AO for a fresh assessment, allowing the assessee an opportunity to produce records.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a partnership firm, had its case reopened. During assessment, it failed to produce its books of accounts, leading the Assessing Officer (AO) to make a best judgment assessment by estimating income at 8% and disallowing partner remuneration and interest. The CIT(A) sustained these additions.

What were the issues?

Whether the AO was justified in making a best judgment assessment by applying an 8% net profit rate without considering previous years' profit margins and the reasons for non-production of books. Whether disallowance of partner remuneration and interest was appropriate under the circumstances.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 184,Section 185,Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ : NEW DELHI

Before: SH. N.K.BILLAIYA & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA

For Respondent: Shri Anuj Garg, Sr. DR
Hearing: 21.03.2023Pronounced: 23.03.2023

Per Anubhav Sharma, JM :

The appeal has been filed by the Assessee against order dated 30.09.2019 passed for assessment year 2011-12, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or in short ‘Ld. F.A.A.’) in regard to the appeal before it arising out of assessment order dated 25.12.2018 u/s 144/148 of I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by DCIT, Circle-62(1), New Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. Assessing officer or in short Ld. AO).

9224.

Del.2019 M/s. K.B. Contractors (Partnership), New Delhi

2.

The assessee is a partnership firm and its case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act. During the assessment proceedings in response to notice u/s 148, return was f

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →