← All Benches

ITAT Hyderabad Bench

10,989 judgments

MUKTESWAR RAO PASUMARTHI,KHAMMAM vs ITO., WARD-1, KHAMMAM

ITA 745/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

us: 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order passed by the learned CIT (A), NFAC, Delhi u/s.250 of the Act for the A.Y. 2017-18 is erroneous and bad in law.

MALLIKARJUNA RAO BRAHMARAUTHU,SANGA REDDY vs ITO., WARD-1, SANGA REDDY

ITA 705/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

JOGINDRA KOTAPALLI,RAJAHMUNDRY vs ITO., WARD-1(1), TIRUPATI

ITA 688/HYD/2025[2015-2016]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2015-2016

SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

SUNIL KUMAR JAIN,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 616/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2021-22

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

NIMMATOORI SULOCHANA,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 603/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

NIMMATOORI YASHODA,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 602/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

TULJA SINGH MADABALOO,HYDERABAD vs ITO,, WARD-7(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 508/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

us : (i) The ex-parte assessment order dated 29.11.2019 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(2), Hyderabad, for the assessment year 2017-18 is quite contrary to law, against weight of evidence and probabilities of the case. (ii) The petitioner could not represent before the Income Tax Officer, as the Chartered Accountant, Mr.N.Laxminarayana was not well and was advised complete bed, resulted into ex-parte assessment order. Further the appeal filed could not be represented before the Com

VIJAYANAND NITHYANAND,CHITTOOR vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, CHITTOOR

ITA 488/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs NET NET VENTURES PVT LTD, HYDERABAD

ITA 385/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2018-19

SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

PEOPLE MEDIA FACTORY LLP,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 298/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2020-21

SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member)

MB AKKAIAH AND COMPANY,MIRYALGUDA vs ACIT., CIRCLE-7(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1133/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member)

KIRAN REDDY VISIREDDY,HYDERABAD vs DCIT, CIRCLE-12(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1131/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member)

SRI MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM,KARIMNAGAR vs CIT(EXEMPTION), BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD.

ITA 1083/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2025-26

SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

SRI MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM,KARIMNAGAR, TELANGANA vs CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

ITA 1082/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2025-26

SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

POTU JANARDHAN RAO,WARANGAL vs ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

ITA 1072/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2018-19

SUDHAKAR AKUTOTA,WARANGAL vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, WARANGAL

ITA 1068/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2013-14

SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

CHETAN AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1052/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2020-21

us: 1 The order passed u/s 250 of the Act for the AV 2020-21 by the learned CIT(A)-11, Hyderabad dated 15.05.2025 is bad in law and on the facts of the case. 2 On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A)-11, Hyderabad erred in upholding the assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s.254 of the Act pasted by the learned AO on 22.11.2024 try making an addition of Rs.4,46,61,050/- by once again repeating the additions made in the assessment order passed u/s.144 of the Act dated 23.09

SRI MAISAMMA DEVATNA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

ITA 1050/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2025-26

Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Manjunatha, G. (Accountant Member)

SRI MAISAMMA DEVATNA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

ITA 1049/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2025-26

Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Member | S.No | ITA No | Appellant | Respondent | |:-----|:--------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------------------------| | 1 | 1043/Hyd/2025 | Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Devasthanam, Mahbubnagar PAN: AAHTS2887G | CIT (Exemptions) Hyderabad | | 2 | 1044/Hyd/2025 | -do- | -do- | | 3 | 1049/Hyd/2025 | Sri Mai

SRI KURUMURTHY SWAMY DEVASTHANAM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

ITA 1044/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed10/9/2025AY 2025-26

Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Manjunatha, G. (Accountant Member)