Section 94(7) of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 94(7) is CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. (326 ITR 1), cited in 543 of the 30 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 94(7)

CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd.
326 ITR 1 · 2010 · Supreme Court
543
citing judgments

For attracting Section 14A disallowance, there must be a proximate cause relating the expenditure to actual tax-exempt income, and such disallowance is not automatic but requires positive material. Additionally, Section 94(7) on dividend stripping only ignores losses to the extent of dividend received for assessment years post-April 1, 2002, allowing the remaining loss.

Gramaphone Co. of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pandey
132 Taxmann 373 · 2003 · Supreme Court
146
citing judgments

An act that is otherwise valid in law cannot be treated as non-existent or invalid merely because of an underlying motive to reduce tax liability or a perceived economic detriment to national interest; legitimate tax planning is permissible.

CIT v. Walfort Share & Stockbrokers (P) Ltd.
233 CTR 42 · 2010 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments
Calcutta in Eveready Industries India Ltd. v. CIT & Anr.
334 ITR 413 · 2011 · High Court
15
citing judgments
Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan& Anr.
184 CTR 450 · 2003 · Reported
11
citing judgments
Karan Maheshwari v. ACIT
176 Taxmann.com 700 · 2025 · Reported
8
citing judgments
McDowell & Co\nLtd v. CTO
47 CTR 126 · 1985 · Reported
8
citing judgments
Agencies Rajasthan (P) Ltd. v. ITO
109 Taxmann.com 139 · Reported
5
citing judgments
Income Tax Officer, Income Tax v. Sumitra Rajeshbhai Jain, Mumbai
2025 SCC OnLine ITAT 1859 · 2025 · Reported
3
citing judgments
434 ITR 1 (Bom.) (FB), Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. DCIT
462 ITR 307 · High Court
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 94(7)

M/S. KANAK PROJECTS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 8(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1283/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G & Shri Sonjoy Sarmam/S Kanak Projects Limited, Vs Dcit, Circle-8(1), Kolkata Salarpuria Jajodia @ Co. 7, Chittaranjan Avenue, Kolkata-700072 Pan No. Aabck 1255 F (अपीलधर्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. निर्धाररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sujoy Sen, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kapil Mandal, Addl.Cit-Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 18/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19 /09/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manjunatha G, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 07.04.2025 Pertaining To Assessment Year 2013-2014. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee E-Filed Its Return Of Income For Assessment Year 2013-2014 On 26.09.2013 Declaring Total Income At Rs.6,11,89,350/-. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & The Assessment Has Been Completed U/S.143(3) Of The Act On 09.03.2016 & Determined The Total Income At Rs.6,77,12,890/- By, Inter Alia, Making Additions Towards Disallowance Of Capital Expenditure For Rs.52,58,956/-, Rental Income Not Offered To Tax At Rs.8,77,945/-, Disallowance Of Excess Depreciation At Rs.3,75,000/- & Addition Towards Dividend Stripping Income U/S.94(7) Of The Act For Rs.1,636/-.

For Appellant: Shri Sujoy Sen, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kapil Mandal, Addl.CIT-Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 94(7)

Showing 120 of 30 · Page 1 of 2