Section 80IA(8) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.138

Section 80IA(8) falls under section 80IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 138 (Deductions in respect of profits and gains from industrial undertakings or enterprises engaged in infrastructure development, etc) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 138 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80IA(8) is CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. (339 ITR 632), cited in 218 of the 48 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80IA(8)

CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.
339 ITR 632 · 2011 · High Court
218
citing judgments

No substantial question of law arises regarding a subsidy granted for setting up a new industrial unit in a backward area for employment generation, as held by the Bombay High Court. This decision was subsequently set aside by the Supreme Court.

CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd.
42 Taxmann.com 551 · 2014 · High Court
104
citing judgments

Inter-unit transfer of power by an industrial undertaking eligible for Section 80IA deduction constitutes a specified domestic transaction under Section 92BA, requiring valuation at arm's length. This decision clarifies the application of Section 80IA(8) and transfer pricing regulations for such transactions.

Climate Systems India Ltd. v. CIT
319 ITR 109 · 2009 · High Court
67
citing judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited
395 ITR 247 · 2017 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 80IA is allowable for captive power generation. The price for calculating this deduction is the rate at which the electricity board supplies power to its consumers, rather than the rate at which power generating companies supply to the electricity board.

100 TT J 224 (IT AT Kolkatta) 4. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT
16 SOT 509 · 2007 · ITAT
48
citing judgments

The Tribunal is bound by its own previous decision for a prior assessment year, especially when no contrary decision exists, and should follow consistent pronouncements of other High Courts and Tribunals.

J.J. Enterprises v. CIT
254 ITR 216 · 2002 · Supreme Court
45
citing judgments

Disallowances of expenses cannot be made based on mere suspicion or unsubstantiated statements of higher expenses; tangible evidence is required to justify additions.

SC in CIT v. Delhi Safe Deposits Co. Ltd.
133 ITR 756 · 1982 · Supreme Court
44
citing judgments

Expenditure is laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of trade or business when it is incurred by the assessee as incidental to their trade, for the purpose of keeping the trade going and making it pay, and not in any other capacity than as a trader.

CIT v. EHPT India P Ltd.
350 ITR 41 · 2013 · High Court
41
citing judgments

The headcount method is an appropriate allocation key for indirect expenses between eligible and non-eligible units when it has been consistently accepted by revenue authorities and there is no just cause for abandoning it. Deviation from a consistently followed and accepted method can disturb or distort profits.

DCW Ltd. v. ACIT
37 SOT 322 · 2010 · ITAT
39
citing judgments

Indirect expenses not directly relatable to an industrial undertaking cannot be considered for computing income eligible for deduction under Section 80-1A. The income and expenditures to be reckoned for this deduction must be directly related to the industrial unit.

Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalis & Chemicals Ltd.
88 Taxmann.com 722 · 2017 · High Court
35
citing judgments

For the purpose of computing the deduction allowable under Section 80IA, the market price of electricity supplied by a captive power plant (CPP) is to be determined by adopting the rate at which the manufacturing unit has been purchasing electricity from the open market.

Judgments on Section 80IA(8)