Section 245C of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 245C is 456 (SC) 2. CIT v. Neha Builders (P) LTD. (4 Taxmann 183), cited in 21 of the 32 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 245C

456 (SC) 2. CIT v. Neha Builders (P) LTD.
4 Taxmann 183 · 1980 · High Court
21
citing judgments
CIT v. Maruti Fabrics
47 Taxmann.com 298 · 2014 · High Court
18
citing judgments
Anantnadh Constructions and Farms (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
166 ITD 83 · ITAT
16
citing judgments
Dolat Investments Ltd. v. DCIT
38 SOT 123 · 2010 · ITAT
13
citing judgments
CIT v. Apar Industries Ltd.
323 ITR 411 · 2010 · High Court
11
citing judgments
PCIT v. Jignesh P. Shah
99 Taxmann.com 111 · 2018 · High Court
11
citing judgments
Commissioner v. Maruti Fabrics
47 Taxmann.com 297 · Reported
9
citing judgments
LaxmanBalwantBhopatkar by Dr. DhananjayaRamchandraGadgil v. Charity Commissioner, Bombay
2 SCR 625 · 1963 · Reported
7
citing judgments
Dimple Enterprises v. DCIT
154 Taxmann.com 653 · 2023 · Reported
6
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 245C

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2577/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: This Tribunal.

Section 132Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 2576/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. G. Tarun, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 132Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

SNW SMITH CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 05, DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals pertaining to Assessment Years

ITA 1636/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Hasneeta Matta, Adv, &For Respondent: Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 153A

SNW SMITH CONSULTANT PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals pertaining to Assessment Years

ITA 1634/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Hasneeta Matta, Adv, &For Respondent: Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 153A

SNW SMITH CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals pertaining to Assessment Years

ITA 1633/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Hasneeta Matta, Adv, &For Respondent: Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 153A

ITO-28(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. SATYA PRAKASH SINGH, MUMBAI

In the result, the ground so taken by the assessee so far as it relates to challenging the order of the AO as passed beyond the period of limitation is hereby allowed

ITA 3844/MUM/2025[2012]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Aug 2025

Bench: Justice (Retd.) Shri C.V. Bhadang & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153Section 69C

MR. SATYA PRAKASH SINGH,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-28(3)(1), VASHI

In the result, the ground so taken by the assessee so far as it relates to challenging the order of the AO as passed beyond the period of limitation is hereby allowed

ITA 3715/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Justice (Retd.) Shri C.V. Bhadang & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153Section 69C

ASHOK BHARTI GOSWAMI,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1272/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: S/Shri Kishor B Phadke &For Respondent: S/Shri Sandeep Sengupta, CIT &
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 153C

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1269/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: S/Shri Kishor B Phadke &For Respondent: S/Shri Sandeep Sengupta, CIT &
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 153C

RAMLAL BHIKULAL SHAH,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1268/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: S/Shri Kishor B Phadke &For Respondent: S/Shri Sandeep Sengupta, CIT &
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 153C

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1262/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: S/Shri Kishor B Phadke &For Respondent: S/Shri Sandeep Sengupta, CIT &
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 153C

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4 (1), MUMBAI vs. OBEROI REALTY LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 5128/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Thar,ARFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Pamnani (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 22Section 23Section 23(5)

OBEROI REALTY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE -4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 4803/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Thar,ARFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Pamnani (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 22Section 23Section 23(5)

OBEROI REALTY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE -4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 4802/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Thar,ARFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Pamnani (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 22Section 23Section 23(5)

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT - CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 317/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245D(1)Section 250Section 254

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT CC - 2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 316/MUM/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245D(1)Section 250Section 254

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 314/MUM/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245D(1)Section 250Section 254

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT-CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 269/MUM/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245D(1)Section 250Section 254

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT-CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 268/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245D(1)Section 250Section 254

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT-CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 267/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 245D(1)Section 250Section 254

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2