Section 144C(10) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.275

Section 144C(10) falls under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 275 (Reference to Dispute Resolution Panel) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 275 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 144C(10) is CIT v. NIIT Ltd. (318 ITR 289), cited in 79 of the 39 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 144C(10)

CIT v. NIIT Ltd.
318 ITR 289 · 2009 · High Court
79
citing judgments

A composite agreement, even if charges are broken down, cannot be dissected to apply Section 194I for TDS on rent when the agreement is a business arrangement for mutual obligations.

Guffic Chem (P.) Ltd. v. CIT
332 ITR 602 · 2011 · Supreme Court
66
citing judgments

Compensation received for a non-compete covenant or for not carrying on a specific business activity is a capital receipt and not liable to tax as business income.

DIT v. Escorts Cardiac Diseases Hospital
300 ITR 75 · 2008 · High Court
59
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by an assessee in one assessment year, which is allowable as a deduction in that year, can be taxed in a subsequent year if it is written back. The deduction in the earlier year is a prerequisite for taxation in the subsequent year.

Trib.) Giesecke & Devrient 16.994%). India Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT
120 Taxmann.com 338 · 2020 · High Court
52
citing judgments

The provisions of a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) would prevail over the domestic law rate of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under Section 115-O.

Verizon Communications Singapore Pte. Ltd. v. ITO (International Taxation)
39 Taxmann.com 70 · 2013 · High Court
43
citing judgments

The case establishes that in the modern virtual world, an entity's virtual presence, rather than just physical presence, is key to determining its operational extent, especially when equipment is placed at customer premises. This principle guides the characterization of payments to non-residents, often as royalty, attracting withholding tax under Section 195, considering statutory explanations for deemed accrual of income.

Niko Resources Ltd. v. Union of India
374 ITR 369 · 2015 · High Court
40
citing judgments

The retrospective insertion of an Explanation to Section 80IB(9) of the Income Tax Act is unconstitutional. Blocks licensed under a single contract cannot be treated as a single undertaking for the purpose of deduction under Section 80IB(9).

Poompuhar Shipping Corporation Ltd. v. ITO
360 ITR 257 · 2014 · High Court
39
citing judgments

The 'use or right to use' of an asset, which is a condition for royalty income, is satisfied when possession and control are given to the hirer for their beneficial use, even if the owner retains ultimate ownership.

Vivek Jain v. ACIT
337 ITR 74 · 2011 · High Court
35
citing judgments

If a property is not let out at all, notional income must be computed, and the benefit of section 23(1)(c) (vacancy allowance) cannot be extended. However, section 23(1)(c) can apply to properties let out for two or more years that remain vacant for the entire previous year.

Harshad J. Choksi v. CIT
349 ITR 250 · 2012 · High Court
33
citing judgments

An amount not allowed as a deduction under a specific section can still be considered a business loss if it was incurred for business purposes.

Wipro Finance Ltd. v. CIT
443 ITR 250 · 2022 · Supreme Court
29
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer has a duty to grant benefits and reliefs during assessment, even if they are not claimed by the assessee in their return of income.

Judgments on Section 144C(10)