Section 144C(10) of the Income Tax Act
Income-tax Act, 2025: s.275
Section 144C(10) falls under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 275 (Reference to Dispute Resolution Panel) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.
Read section 275 of the 2025 Act
Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.
The decision most relied on for Section 144C(10) is CIT v. NIIT Ltd. (318 ITR 289), cited in 79 of the 39 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 144C(10)
A composite agreement, even if charges are broken down, cannot be dissected to apply Section 194I for TDS on rent when the agreement is a business arrangement for mutual obligations.
Compensation received for a non-compete covenant or for not carrying on a specific business activity is a capital receipt and not liable to tax as business income.
Expenditure incurred by an assessee in one assessment year, which is allowable as a deduction in that year, can be taxed in a subsequent year if it is written back. The deduction in the earlier year is a prerequisite for taxation in the subsequent year.
The provisions of a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) would prevail over the domestic law rate of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under Section 115-O.
The case establishes that in the modern virtual world, an entity's virtual presence, rather than just physical presence, is key to determining its operational extent, especially when equipment is placed at customer premises. This principle guides the characterization of payments to non-residents, often as royalty, attracting withholding tax under Section 195, considering statutory explanations for deemed accrual of income.
The retrospective insertion of an Explanation to Section 80IB(9) of the Income Tax Act is unconstitutional. Blocks licensed under a single contract cannot be treated as a single undertaking for the purpose of deduction under Section 80IB(9).
The 'use or right to use' of an asset, which is a condition for royalty income, is satisfied when possession and control are given to the hirer for their beneficial use, even if the owner retains ultimate ownership.
If a property is not let out at all, notional income must be computed, and the benefit of section 23(1)(c) (vacancy allowance) cannot be extended. However, section 23(1)(c) can apply to properties let out for two or more years that remain vacant for the entire previous year.
An amount not allowed as a deduction under a specific section can still be considered a business loss if it was incurred for business purposes.
The Assessing Officer has a duty to grant benefits and reliefs during assessment, even if they are not claimed by the assessee in their return of income.