Section 115WD of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 115WD is 46 Taxmann.com 169 (Delhi); Kanji Mai & Sons. v. CIT (189 ITR 326), cited in 25 of the 39 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 115WD
46 Taxmann.com 169 (Delhi); Kanji Mai & Sons. v. CIT
189 ITR 326 · 1991 · High Court
25
citing judgments
Income-tax authorities are of co-ordinate jurisdiction, and the Act does not prescribe their respective jurisdictions or functions, leaving it to be decided by the Board or Commissioner. Allocation of jurisdiction is for administrative convenience and does not invalidate actions due to defects in its exercise.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. BharatkumarModi
246 ITR 693 · 2000 · High Court
10
citing judgments
P.A. Ahammed v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
282 ITR 334 · 2006 · High Court
8
citing judgments
Harshad Chiman Lal Modi v. DLF Universal Ltd. & Anr.
7 SCC 791 · 2005 · Reported
7
citing judgments
MahalliramRamniranjan Das v. CIT
156 ITR 885 · 1985 · Reported
4
citing judgments
Asstt. CIT v. Mrs. N. Meenakshi
125 TTJ 856 · 2009 · ITAT
3
citing judgments
CIT v. Noorul Islam Educational Trust
375 ITR 226 · 2015 · High Court
3
citing judgments
Judgments on Section 115WD
Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2