THE SALUR GIRIJAN CO OP MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

Section 144 and 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), respectively, for A.Y. 2020-21. As common issues are involved in the captioned appeals, therefore, the same are taken up and disposed of by this consolidated order. 2. We shall first take up the appeal filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2020-21 in wherein

THE SALURU GIRIJAN CO OP MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,SALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

Section 144 and 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), respectively, for A.Y. 2020-21. As common issues are involved in the captioned appeals, therefore, the same are taken up and disposed of by this consolidated order. 2. We shall first take up the appeal filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2020-21 in wherein

NANDYALA NAGA VENKATA RAJU,WEST GODAVARI DIST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TANAKU

166 days\nby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, had observed, that a justice\noriented and liberal approach should be adopted while considering the application filed\nby an appellant seeking condonation of the delay involved in the appeal. We thus, in\nterms of our aforesaid observations condone the delay of 176 days involved in filing of\nthe present appeal

KVC INFRASTRUCTURES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

Section 249 of the Act, in all fairness, ought to have condoned the delay involved in the appeal filed by the assessee firm before him. Our aforesaid view that a justice-oriented and liberal approach should be taken while dealing with an application filed by the assessee seeking condonation of the delay in filing of the appeal is supported

SREERAMULU PENTAKOTA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

section 143(1) of the Act. Page. No 4 I.T.A.No.555/VIZ/2025 Sreeramulu Pentakota 9. We have given thoughtful consideration to the reasons leading to the delay in filing the present appeal by the assessee in the backdrop of the material available on record. In our view, there is substance in the Ld. AR’s contention that as the assessee during

SRILAKSHMI DEVIREDDY,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(5), VIJAYAWADA

166 days by the Income Tax\nAppellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, had observed, that a justice oriented and liberal\napproach should be adopted while considering the application filed by an appellant\nseeking condonation of the delay involved in the appeal. I thus, in terms of my aforesaid\nobservations, condone the delay of 161 days involved in filing the present appeal

LATE RAMA KUMARI MUNNA REPRESENTED BY SHRI SHIVAYYA MUNNA HUSBAND LEGAL HEIR,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

section 148 of the Act dated 29.03.2021, as well as on the merits advanced regarding the addition of Rs.93,47,704/- made by the A.O under the head “Long Term Capital Gains” (for short, “LTCG”). 4. The legal heir of the assessee (since deceased) has assailed the impugned order passed by the CIT(A) dated 26.12.2024 before

SRINIVASA RAO SIRIVURI PROPRIETOR,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

166 days by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, had observed, that a justice oriented and liberal approach should be adopted while considering the application filed by an appellant seeking condonation of the delay involved in the appeal. We thus, in Page. No 5 I.T.A.No.459/VIZ/2025 Srinivasa Rao Sirivuri terms of our aforesaid observations condone the delay

AGRI GOLD FOODS AND FARM PRODUCTS LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Us:

166 days by the Tribunal, had observed that a justice-oriented and liberal approach should be adopted while considering the application filed by an appellant seeking condonation of the delay involved in filing the appeal. We thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations, condone the delay involved in the filing of the present appeal. 6. Succinctly stated, the assessee company

GANGUNAIDU SABBAVARAPU,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), VISAKHPATNAM

166 days by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,\nRaipur Bench, had observed that a justice oriented and liberal approach\nshould be adopted while considering the application filed by an\nappellant seeking condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. We thus,\nin terms of our aforesaid observations, condone the delay involved in\nfiling of the present appeal.\n5. The assessee

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

166 days by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, had observed that a justice oriented and liberal approach should be adopted while considering the application filed by an appellant seeking condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. We thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations, condone the delay involved in filing of the present appeal. 10. We have

JAYBHERI ENTERPRISES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.410/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2021-22) Jaybheri Enterprises, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Circle-1(1), Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaofj1639A (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Sri Mn. Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 24/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 30/09/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm : The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 11/12/2024, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 144 R.W.S 144B Of The Income

section 250(6) of the IT Act which obligates the CIT(A) to dispose of the appeal on merits. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the assessee had made contractual payments of Rs. 1,10,43,654/- and Rs. 4,48,43,233/- to sub-contracts, after deducting tax at source in compliance with

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD ( PRESENTLY MERGED WITH SBI),VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bank are allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 382 & 383/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16) State Bank Of Hyderabad Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Presently Merged With (Tds), State Bank Of India), Tds Ward-1, South Central Railway Vijayawada. Branch, Near Railway Station, Vijayawada- 520001. Pan: Aaacs8577K (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate (For Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 07/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 10/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order

166 days by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, had observed, that a justice oriented and liberal approach should be adopted while considering the application filed by an appellant seeking condonation of the delay involved in filing the appeal. 13. Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate, the Learned Authorized Representative (for short “Ld. AR”) for the assessee, at the threshold

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD (PRESENTLY MERGED WITH SBI),VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bank are allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 382 & 383/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16) State Bank Of Hyderabad Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Presently Merged With (Tds), State Bank Of India), Tds Ward-1, South Central Railway Vijayawada. Branch, Near Railway Station, Vijayawada- 520001. Pan: Aaacs8577K (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate (For Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 07/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 10/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order

166 days by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, had observed, that a justice oriented and liberal approach should be adopted while considering the application filed by an appellant seeking condonation of the delay involved in filing the appeal. 13. Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate, the Learned Authorized Representative (for short “Ld. AR”) for the assessee, at the threshold