THE SALURU GIRIJAN CO OP MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,SALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal determined that the assessee, operating in a remote area with tribal employees unfamiliar with computers, had a bona fide reason for the delay, having learned of the assessment only upon receiving a demand letter. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the Tribunal ruled that a liberal approach should be taken for condonation of delay. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) to condone the delay and decide the appeal on its merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative marketing society, filed a nil income return for AY 2020-21. The AO issued an ex parte assessment under Section 144, disallowing a deduction under Section 80P(2)(f) and levying a penalty under Section 270A, due to the assessee's failure to provide details. The assessee's appeal to CIT(A) was dismissed as time-barred due to a 344-day delay, which the CIT(A) refused to condone.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in not condoning the 344-day delay in filing the appeal by the assessee, a cooperative society, against ex parte assessment and penalty orders.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 270A,Section 143(1),Section 80P(2)(f),Section 10(26B),Section 249(3),Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
निर्धाररती/The Assessee : The Salur Girijan Co-op Marketing Society Limited, C/o. Senior Manager, Girijan Co-op Marketing Society, Salur, Vijayanagaram Dist 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Income Tax Officer, Ward –1, Vijayanagaram. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam. 4. नवभधगीयप्रनतनिनर्, आयकर अपीलीय अनर्करण, विशाखापटणम / DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam. 5. गधर्ाफ़धईल / Guard file
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026