BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 1clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,682Mumbai5,627Bangalore2,738Chennai2,362Kolkata1,484Pune1,161Ahmedabad760Hyderabad673Karnataka600Patna558Jaipur481Indore391Raipur386Chandigarh329Cochin302Nagpur283Visakhapatnam195Lucknow186Surat168Rajkot167Jodhpur108Cuttack100Dehradun83Ranchi81Telangana79Amritsar71Agra63Panaji58Guwahati53Jabalpur42SC28Calcutta21Allahabad18Kerala17Rajasthan10Varanasi9Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand3Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)28Section 20115Section 143(3)5Addition to Income5Section 133A4Section 14A4Section 44Deduction4Disallowance4Survey u/s 133A

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (1),, VARANASI vs. PROMINENT DATAMATICS MARKETING PVT. LTD., , VARANASI

ITA 135/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 124(1)(a)Section 124(2)Section 124(3)(a)Section 250(1)Section 255(4)Section 69A

Section 23(3)." **** **** **** **** "In this case we are of the opinion that the Tribunal violated certain fundamental rules of justice in reaching its conclusions. Firstly, it did not disclose to the assessee what information had been supplied to it by the departmental representative. Next, it did not give any opportunity to the company to rebut the material furnished

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER,CHANDAULI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS - 1, VARANASI

4
TDS4
Section 201(1)3

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 5/VNS/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Oct 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 201Section 201(1)

1) of the I.T. Act. However, interest under section 201(1A) of the I.T. Act is leviable wherein the Principal Officer (deductor) does not deduct the whole or any part of the tax or after deducting fails to pay the tax as required by or under this Act. In that case he is liable to pay simple interest

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER,CHANDAULI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS - 1, VARANASI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 7/VNS/2023[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Oct 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 201Section 201(1)

1) of the I.T. Act. However, interest under section 201(1A) of the I.T. Act is leviable wherein the Principal Officer (deductor) does not deduct the whole or any part of the tax or after deducting fails to pay the tax as required by or under this Act. In that case he is liable to pay simple interest

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, ,CHANDAULI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, TDS - 1, VARANASI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 6/VNS/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Oct 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 201Section 201(1)

1) of the I.T. Act. However, interest under section 201(1A) of the I.T. Act is leviable wherein the Principal Officer (deductor) does not deduct the whole or any part of the tax or after deducting fails to pay the tax as required by or under this Act. In that case he is liable to pay simple interest

RAMESH CHANDRA JAISWAL,GORAKHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (5), GORAKHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 31/VNS/2023[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Dec 2025AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 56

section 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, 50000 Provided that monetary gift received by an individual or HUF from relatives will not be charged to tax and spouse falls under the definition of relatives as per the Income Tax Act. 5. Interest on FDR made as on 01-08-2008 in the name of my wife Maya Jaiswal. TDS

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LTD.,GORAKHPUR vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 13/VNS/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

Section 68 inasmuch as it is not in dispute that the creditors outstanding related to purchases and the trading results were accepted by the AO. We are, therefore, of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this case. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.” 8.7 Since the assessing officer, in the instant case, has assessed trade

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR vs. THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED, GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 217/ALLD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

Section 68 inasmuch as it is not in dispute that the creditors outstanding related to purchases and the trading results were accepted by the AO. We are, therefore, of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this case. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.” 8.7 Since the assessing officer, in the instant case, has assessed trade

DCIT,, GORAKHPUR vs. M/S MAHABIR JITE MILLS, LTD., GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 448/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

Section 68 inasmuch as it is not in dispute that the creditors outstanding related to purchases and the trading results were accepted by the AO. We are, therefore, of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this case. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.” 8.7 Since the assessing officer, in the instant case, has assessed trade

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 351/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

Section 68 inasmuch as it is not in dispute that the creditors outstanding related to purchases and the trading results were accepted by the AO. We are, therefore, of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this case. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.” 8.7 Since the assessing officer, in the instant case, has assessed trade