The Commissioner of Income TAx-IV, vs. M/s. Mahaveer Enterprises (India) Limited

The Appeal is dismissed

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

price, but instead of getting a deed of conveyance gets a SA/GPA/WILL as a mode of transfer, either at the instance of the vendor or at his own instance. Ill - effects of SA/GPA/WILL transactions: Page 41 of 76 C/LPA/94/2008 JUDGMENT DATED: 06/07/2021 RAVJIBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL SINCE DECD. THR'HEIRS V/s ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY U.L.C. 3. The earlier order

The Prl. Commissioner of Income Tax-4, vs. M/s. Prabhath Agri Bio Tech P. Ltd.,

Bench: ANIS,SANJAY KUMAR

TP)A No.1628/Bang/2014 (The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax vs. M/s.Software AG Bangalore Technologies Pvt. Ltd.,) for A.Y.2010-11. 2. This appeal has been admitted on 11.10.2017 to consider the following substantial questions of law framed by the learned counsel for the Appellants- Revenue:- Date of Judgment 25-07-2018 I.T.A.No.495/2016 Principal Commissioner of Income

Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply AND Sewerage Board vs. The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax

TP] A Nos.1372/Bang/2011 and 20/Bang/2012 dated 28-03-2013 relating to the Assessment Year 2005-06. 2. These Appeals have been admitted on 27.06.2014 to consider the following substantial questions of law as framed by the Revenue in the Memorandum of Appeal: “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified