BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 144C(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,950Mumbai1,753Bangalore842Hyderabad279Pune267Kolkata215Chennai190Ahmedabad132Visakhapatnam33Chandigarh30Cochin29Jaipur29Karnataka21Indore16Rajkot15Dehradun15Surat12Cuttack8Kerala5Telangana4Panaji4Amritsar3Guwahati3SC3Calcutta2Raipur2Jabalpur1Lucknow1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 9(1)(vi)5Section 260A3Section 143(3)3Section 1472Double Taxation/DTAA2

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Laila Impex,

Accordingly answered against the Revenue. The appeals fail and are dismissed, without

ITTA/473/2012HC Telangana09 Jul 2013
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 260ASection 9(1)(vi)

144C applied Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act to tax the income of the assessee as royalty. 6. The assessees in the present cases both derive income from the “lease of transponders” of their respective satellites. This lease is for the object of relaying signals of their customers; both resident and non-resident TV channels that wish to broadcast

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), vs. M/s Country Club Inda Limited

ITTA/667/2014HC Telangana29 Jan 2015
Section 143(3)
Section 147
Section 260A

144C of the Act in respect of AY 2008-09. 4. By an order dated 24th February, 2015, ITA Nos. 666/2014, 667/2014 and 673/2014 were admitted and the following questions of law were framed:- "(i). Whether the Tribunal erred in concluding that the Appellant had a Permanent Establishment (PE) within the meaning of Article 5 of the Double Taxation Avoidance

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s.Viskha Container Terminal Private Limited

ITTA/439/2018HC Telangana08 Oct 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 143(2)Section 260Section 268

3) read with 92CA and 144C of the IT Act. The undisputed facts also reveal that the respondent company pursuant to the scheme of amalgamation stood merged with the Wipro Limited, the Scheme of amalgamation was approved by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh vide order dated 21.02.2008 and by the High Court of Karnataka vide order dated 10.01.2008 with

Sarwar Ahuja, vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1),

Accordingly dismissed. Pending applications are also dismissed

ITTA/173/2025HC Telangana28 Oct 2025

Bench: The Learned Itat Assailing The Order Dated 05.01.2024 Passed By The Assessing Officer [Ao] Under Section 147 Read With Section 144C(13) Of The Act. 3. The Assessee Is A Company, Which Is Tax Resident Of The United States Of America [Usa]. The Assessee Has Also Furnished A Tax Residency Certificate [Trc] From The Concerned Authorities Of The Said Country. Digitally Signed By:Tarun Rana Signing Date:01.06.2025 13:30:53 Signature Not Verified

Section 144C(13)Section 147Section 260ASection 9(1)(vii)

transfer of technical plan or technical design within the meaning of Article 12(4) of Digitally Signed By:TARUN RANA Signing Date:01.06.2025 13:30:53 Signature Not Verified ITA 173/2025 Page 3 of 14 India-USA DTAA?” 5. As noted above, the Assessee is a tax resident of USA and is engaged in the business of providing services which