The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt. Raj Kumari

Accordingly are partly allowed

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

127 Niagara Trail, Georgetown Ontario L7GOA6, Canada 2-f) Prakash Laxmichand Aad, Age 71 years, Occu. R/o 20 Pickard Avenue, Ancaster, Ontario, L9K1T3, Canada, 5 LPA-22-2008+ Now R/o C/o. Erandwane, Pune Tq & Dist. Pune .. Appellants (Orig. Petitioners) Versus 1] Bhanudas S/o Ranga Ingale Age : 81 years, Occu : Agri., R/o Shelka-Dhanora, Tq. Kallam, Dist. Osmanabad Through Power

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) vs. Madhu Enterprises

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD

127, 129, Hatia through its Director Sri Binod Kumar Agarwal ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi 3. Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Administration), Ranchi Division, Ranchi 4. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (South Circle), Ranchi .…. … Respondents With W.P.(T) No.3576 of 2017 with I.A. No.5192

S.l. Shiva Raj vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

127, 129, Hatia through its Director Sri Binod Kumar Agarwal ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi 3. Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Administration), Ranchi Division, Ranchi 4. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (South Circle), Ranchi .…. … Respondents With W.P.(T) No.3576 of 2017 with I.A. No.5192

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. M/S GOLDEN STAR FACILITIES AND SERVICES PVT LTD., HYD

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 13 which provides for Rule making power of the Central Government in respect of minerals. Section 13 subsection (1) WP(C). 11249/2010 & other contd cases. -:88:- and Section 13 Sub-section (2) in so far as relevant in the present case are as follows: “13. Power of Central Government to make Rules in respect of minerals.-- (1) The Central

The COmmissioner of Income Tax -IV vs. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd.,

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

Transfer Pricing Provisions? 5. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has also erred in excluding comparable’s on the basis of RPT filter being less than 25% by following its earlier decision which has reached finality not even when the comparable’s are chosen as all the required tests are satisfied?” 3. Learned

Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply AND Sewerage Board vs. The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax

127 DTR 0327 (Kar), which has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, Central – III vs. HCL Technologies Ltd., [2018] 93 Taxmann.com 33(SC). The relevant portion of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of HCL Technologies Ltd. (supra), is quoted below for ready reference

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since, HVL became

The Pr. Commissioner of Income tax (Central), vs. Sri Vaishnavi Educational Society,

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

127 KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 4. MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA REDDY S/O. THIRUPUL REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 5. SMT. MUNIREDDY SAMPORNAM W/O.SRI.MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA REDDY, AGEDA BOUT 53 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5 R/AT NO.75, 3RD MAIN, AMARYA JOTHYI LAYOUT CHOLANAGAR, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032 6. SMT.GEETHA BHAVANI W/O. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 7. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD S/O.SRI.CHENNAKESHAVALU NAIDU AGED ABOUT

The commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/s Lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd

127 of 198 22nd March 2024 Saurer Textile Solutions Pvt Ltd v The State of Maharashtra & Ors & Connected Writ Petitions 1-2-oswp-1494-2023-J+.docx 1. The State of Maharashtra, through the Government Pleader, High Court, Bombay. 2. The Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Raigad, Near Alibaug Police Station, Alibaug, District Raigad