BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,074Mumbai1,611Bangalore576Chennai553Jaipur427Kolkata383Ahmedabad294Hyderabad206Chandigarh138Pune110Rajkot98Amritsar97Indore81Nagpur73Raipur71Surat66Cochin65Patna61Guwahati54Agra48Cuttack38Lucknow38Jodhpur34Ranchi29Visakhapatnam16Allahabad12SC12Dehradun12Karnataka10Jabalpur8Calcutta4Telangana4Gauhati3Panaji3Rajasthan3Orissa3Varanasi2Kerala2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 1534Section 158B4Section 1322Section 260A2Exemption2Reassessment2Addition to Income2Condonation of Delay2

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s.ZENOTECH LABORATORIES LIMITED

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/311/2022HC Telangana16 Oct 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 132Section 153Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 68

reassess the 'total income' of the aforementioned six years in separate assessment orders for each of the six years. In other words there will be only one assessment order in respect of each of the six AYs "in which both the disclosed and the undisclosed

Sunil Kumar Ahuja vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

ITTA/97/2023HC Telangana
08 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 153Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)

income for such assessment d by the Assessing Officers as a Officer will exercise normal of the six years previous to the hich the search takes place. The wer to assess and reassess the entioned six years in separate f the six years. In other words, ment order in respect of each

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. RASA AGROTECH PRIVATE LTD.

Accordingly, the appeals are liable to be dismissed on the

ITTA/453/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 113Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 158BSection 260A

undisclosed income as Rs.1,33,08,737. Aggrieved by the above order, Mr. Arvinder Singh filed an appeal before the ITAT. By the impugned order dated 5th April 2007, the ITAT held that no valid opportunity was granted to the Assessee before making the impugned order of assessment and further that the requisite satisfaction was not recorded

THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T.-I, HYDERABAD. vs. M/S. AKASH CABLE TV NETWORK PVT.LTD., HYDERABAD.

ITTA/253/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260A

reassessment proceedings were initiated after information was received from Director of Investigation regarding bogus/accommodation entries allegedly provided by different companies which were managed and operated by Mukesh Gupta and Rajan Jassal. The Assessing Officer noticed that these companies had been issued shares by the appellant-assessee. A question arose whether the share application money received was a genuine transaction