BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “reassessment”+ Transfer Pricingclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi975Mumbai788Chennai250Bangalore245Hyderabad159Jaipur148Kolkata134Ahmedabad89Chandigarh65Indore45Pune36Rajkot31Raipur29Surat26Lucknow25Karnataka24Guwahati21Agra21Nagpur18Jodhpur16Dehradun11Cochin10Telangana10Cuttack9SC7Amritsar6Patna5Visakhapatnam2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa1Varanasi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)8Section 260A6Exemption5Section 464Business Income4Deduction4Section 65(1)2

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

ITTA/621/2017HC Telangana23 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 260A

Pricing Officer (hereafter “TPO”) who held that the transaction with its associated enterprise (AE) was at arm‟s length. The GSA forbids GEIIPL from: (a) entering into any contract on behalf of GE Group companies (GEIOC and affiliates); (b) from acting as an agent for any GE Group company (GEIOC and affiliates). 4. GE International Inc, i.e GEII

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s.Viskha Container Terminal Private Limited

ITTA/439/2018HC Telangana08 Oct 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 143(2)Section 260Section 268

Pricing Officer (TPO) vide letter dated 30.11.2009 and during the course of proceeding before the TPO, assessee vide its letter dated 09.06.2010 categorically stated that its registered office was at Hyderabad and it stood merged with Wipro Ltd., pursuant to the scheme of amalgamation approved by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh vide order dated 21.02.2008 and scheme of amalgamation

Smt.Sudia Indira vs. The Income Tax Officer

In the result, the appeal from order stand dismissed

ITTA/442/2012HC Telangana16 Jul 2013
Section 114

Transfer of Property Act, sale could become complete when payment of  whole price at the time of execution of sale is made.  According to her,  the price constitutes an essential ingredient of the transaction of the sale  and thus, the real test is the intention of the performance to be gathered  from the various terms and conditions stipulated

Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/S The A.P.Mahesh Coop. Urban Bank Ltd,

In the result, for the above reasons, these appeals fail and

ITTA/718/2006HC Telangana07 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260ASection 46Section 80P(2)(a)

transfer to the reserve fund a sum equivalent not less than 20% of such profit. Further, under Section 18 of the BR Act, every banking company, not being a scheduled bank, shall maintain cash reserve with itself or by way of balance in a current account with the RBI. Such cash reserve shall be equivalent to at least

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. The Andhra Bank Employees Co.Operative Bank Limited

In the result, for the above reasons, these appeals fail and

ITTA/243/2007HC Telangana07 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260ASection 46Section 80P(2)(a)

transfer to the reserve fund a sum equivalent not less than 20% of such profit. Further, under Section 18 of the BR Act, every banking company, not being a scheduled bank, shall maintain cash reserve with itself or by way of balance in a current account with the RBI. Such cash reserve shall be equivalent to at least

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, HYDERABAD vs. M/s. The A.P.Vardhaman(Mahila)Cooperative Urban

In the result, for the above reasons, these appeals fail and

ITTA/715/2006HC Telangana07 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260ASection 46Section 80P(2)(a)

transfer to the reserve fund a sum equivalent not less than 20% of such profit. Further, under Section 18 of the BR Act, every banking company, not being a scheduled bank, shall maintain cash reserve with itself or by way of balance in a current account with the RBI. Such cash reserve shall be equivalent to at least

Commissioner of Income Tax -II vs. The Agrasen Coop. Urban Bank Ltd.,

In the result, for the above reasons, these appeals fail and

ITTA/711/2006HC Telangana07 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260ASection 46Section 80P(2)(a)

transfer to the reserve fund a sum equivalent not less than 20% of such profit. Further, under Section 18 of the BR Act, every banking company, not being a scheduled bank, shall maintain cash reserve with itself or by way of balance in a current account with the RBI. Such cash reserve shall be equivalent to at least

The Commissioner of Income Tax -III vs. Sri T.C. Reddy

The appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/577/2011HC Telangana28 Feb 2012

price paid found to be reasonable, taking an adverse view on the genuineness of M/s Mrigiya Electronics Inds. Pvt. Ltd. On the basis of some enquiry against it in some other case that too for different assessment year will not justified. The AO in Show Cause Notice informed the appellant that Sri Pramod Kumar Sharma, Director M/s Mrigya

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. M/s Hyderabad House Pvt Ltd.,

ITTA/250/2013HC Telangana11 Jul 2013

reassessment of damages. This is what was the theme of discourse in Santosh Devi (supra) and in a later decision in Puttamma (supra). In Puttamma (supra), the Supreme Court called upon the State to explain inaction on its part in the context of authorization given to the Central Government by Section 163-A (3) to make improvements on account

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. Akula Nageswara Rao

In the result, the orders passed by the Assessing

ITTA/422/2017HC Telangana10 Jul 2017

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD

Section 39(1)Section 5Section 65(1)Section 9(2)

price as well as the terms and conditions. The aforesaid quotation states that Dell product would be exported from Malaysia. Thus, the petitioner seeks customer's upfront contractual approval of manufacture and supply of required product from Malaysia. On receipt of the quotation, customer accepts either by signing the same or by raising a purchase order or by making