BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi322Mumbai266Chennai121Bangalore110Jaipur93Chandigarh51Surat50Hyderabad49Kolkata46Ahmedabad44Raipur43Pune29Amritsar14Cochin14Indore14Rajkot13Lucknow13Visakhapatnam10Agra5Calcutta5Karnataka4Nagpur4Telangana4Cuttack4SC2Guwahati1Patna1Jodhpur1Kerala1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1587Section 1324Section 2602

COMM.OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE vs. NAVABHARAT ENTERPRISES HYD

In the result, Income Tax Appeal No

ITTA/3/2000HC Telangana02 Jan 2012

Bench: This Court & Hence Both Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Common Judgment. 2. Sri Ravi Kant, Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Rahul Agarwal, Advocate Have Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee & Sri Manish Goel, Advocate Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of Revenue. 3. Revenue'S Appeal Was Admitted On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law:- (1)Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, Tribunal Was Right In Holding That Authorization For Search

For Appellant: - M/S Verma Roadways Through its Partner R.K.VermaFor Respondent: - Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Section 132Section 158Section 260A

reassessment” in Section 132B shall be construed as references to “block assessment” . (emphasis applied) 26. Photocopy of warrant of authorisation issued in Form 45 under Section 112(I) of Income Tax Rules, pursuant whereto search was conducted at Assessee's premises on 28.11.1996 was produced before Tribunal, which are quoted in para 11.2 of Tribunal's order and relevant extract

SYED ABBAS MIAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-I,KURNOOL

ITTA/128/2018HC Telangana25 Apr 2018

197 (Lohia Machines Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others). 34. Learned advocate appearing for Emami Agrotech Ltd has contended that, the amendments made to the Entry Tax Act, 2012 by the West Bengal Finance Act, 2017 were never meant to be implemented and brought about to nullify the judgement of the learned Single Judge without curing

The Prl Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. Institute of Development and Research in Banking Technology

ITTA/71/2017HC Telangana09 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI,V RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Section 260

197(SC) - Para 14 8 [2020]117 taxmann.com 244 (SC) 9 [2021]123 taxmann.com 468 (Karnataka) - Para 12 to 14 I.T.A No.71/2017 C/W I.T.A No.785/2017 12 14. We have carefully considered rival submissions and perused the records. 15. Undisputed facts of the case are, before passing the Assessment Order on 16.11.2011 under Section

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. M/s Hyderabad House Pvt Ltd.,

ITTA/250/2013HC Telangana11 Jul 2013

Section 166 on fault-liability principle reveals that the compensation received in the former in the present times cannot qualify, by any stretch of reasoning, as “just” compensation. 32. It has been noted ad nauseam in judgments after judgments that the approach of the tribunals and courts in determining the amount of compensation which is “just” has not only been