BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai191Delhi188Chennai122Bangalore60Kolkata55Ahmedabad42Hyderabad27Pune12Surat10SC9Raipur8Cochin6Karnataka5Telangana4Kerala2Amritsar2Guwahati2Ranchi2Indore2Dehradun2Jaipur2Jabalpur1Allahabad1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 809Section 8O8Section 2606Section 260A5Deduction3Section 352Section 102Disallowance2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-IV, HYDERABAD vs. M/S NAVA BHARAT VENTURES LTD., HYD

The appeal is dismissed

ITTA/579/2016HC Telangana20 Jun 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260Section 260ASection 80Section 8O

disallowed the entire claim of deduction under Section 8O-lA of the Act, 19 61. 5. On the other hand, learned counset for respondent while supporting the orders passed by the CIT rA) and the ITAT contending; that the power which was transfer red from power unit to ferro is to be charged with recovery ra-e of power

The Commissioner of Income- Tax - V, vs. M/s. Krishnaveni Constructions,

ITTA/37/2010HC Telangana22 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 143Section 260Section 260A

section 43A distinguishing the capital/revenue nature imbibed therein to result in consideration thereof as were claimed by the assessee before the authorities below. The assessee himself rendered income on gain from exchange fluctuation on identical nature of revenue from loans remaining unpaid. The same is to be allowed on the facts and circumstances of the assessee. 16. The assessee

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, HYDERABAD vs. M/S NAVA BHARAT VENTURES LTD., HYDERABAD

ITTA/251/2014HC Telangana18 Jun 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

For Respondent: C V NARA
Section 260Section 260ASection 80Section 8O

disallowed the entire claim of ded the Act, 1961. 5. On the other hand, le while supporting the orders Passe contending that the Power which unit to ferro is to be charged wi not at which the Power Purch assessee. He further argued companies are supplying Power Rs.2.21 to 3.15 per unit. He agreed willAhe assessee's con ntion that

THE PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [CENTRAL] HYDERABAD vs. M/S SREE NAGENDRA CONSTRUCTIONS, KHAMMAM

In the result, appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/490/2016HC Telangana21 Aug 2018

Bench: This

Section 10Section 260Section 260ASection 35Section 43

disallowance of exchange fluctuation loss of Rs.3,63,47,099/- made by the assessing authority even when the CBDT Instruction No.3/2010 dated 23.03.2010 refers to market losses are notional and contingent and actual losses are allowable as non-speculative only if the transaction qualifies as eligible derivative transaction under clause [d] of proviso to section