BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai556Delhi390Chennai183Kolkata170Bangalore146Raipur107Ahmedabad59Jaipur49Surat34Hyderabad31Visakhapatnam29Cuttack17Lucknow16Amritsar12Indore12Pune11Karnataka10Cochin10Nagpur7Chandigarh4SC4Telangana4Calcutta3Rajasthan3Kerala2Jodhpur2Panaji2Patna2Rajkot1Guwahati1Agra1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 43B3Deduction3Depreciation3Section 260A2Section 143(3)2Section 80I2Section 32(1)2Section 36(1)(va)2

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Dr. T.Ravi Kumar,

ITTA/102/2012HC Telangana24 Jul 2013

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani & The Hon’Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj Date : 10Th April, 2024. Appearance: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate Mr. Sanjay Bhowmick, Advocate Ms. Swapna Das, Advocate … For The Appellant. Ms. Smita Das De, Advocate … For The Respondent. 1. Heard Sri J. P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Sanjay Bhowmick, Learned Counsel For The Appellant/Assessee & Ms. Smita Das De, Learned Senior Standing Counsel For The Respondent. 2. The Assessment Years Involved In The Present Appeal Are Assessment Year 1999-2000 & Assessment Year 2000-01. By Order Dated 16.08.2012, This Appeal Was Admitted On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law :-

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 24(1)(i)Section 32Section 43B

43B in respect of the interest paid to the financial institutions of Rs.3,63,33,321/- for the assessment year 1999-2000 and Rs.60,50,250/- for the assessment year 2000-01 ? 2) Whether on a true and proper interpretation of the provisions of section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 depreciation

The Commissioner of income Tax-II vs. M/s.Ideal Industrial Explosives Ltd

ITTA/100/2010HC Telangana01 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: M/S. CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD., THRISSURFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR

43B has to be read retrospectively to give full effect thereto. Hence, the question stands answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue upholding the order of the Tribunal, which affirmed the deduction as granted by the first appellate authority. 4. The second question in ITA No.3/2010 is also covered in favour of the assessee as found

COMR. OF IT HYD vs. M/S NEERAJ PETRO CHEMICALS LTD HYD

The appeal is partly allowed

ITTA/77/2000HC Telangana23 Jul 2013
Section 143(3)Section 2(18)Section 260ASection 30Section 37(4)Section 80H

depreciation in respect of guest house maintained by the assessee? (C) Whether misc. income amounting to Rs.577.48 Lacs and processing charges amounting to Rs.171.37 lacs, being part and parcel of assessee’s business income and required to be included in the total turnover, the Tribunal was justified in excluding the same for the purposes of computation of deduction u/s.80HHC

The Commissioner of Income tax III vs. M/s. Sree Sree Wines

Accordingly, the appeal (ITAT/75/2010) stands dismissed

ITTA/75/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260ASection 32(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 80I

depreciation as revenue expense and in wrongly applying the provisions of Section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on “Purely Temporary Erections” used for less than 180 days? 3 v) Whether, the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata erred in Law in upholding the addition of Rs.21,376/- made by the Assessing Officer