BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “depreciation”+ Section 207clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai339Delhi339Chennai107Bangalore77Kolkata60Raipur33Ahmedabad31Jaipur26Chandigarh13Indore13Lucknow12Kerala11Hyderabad10Visakhapatnam9Pune9Cuttack8Telangana8SC5Ranchi5Karnataka3Surat3Jodhpur2Guwahati2Rajasthan2Allahabad1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Rajkot1Orissa1Nagpur1Amritsar1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 2602Section 1152Depreciation2Addition to Income2

COMMR OF INCOME TAX HYD vs. M/S.TAHER ENGG CORP. SECBAD

ITTA/85/2002HC Telangana03 Feb 2012

Bench: The Commissioner (Appeals). Through Order, Dated 04.12.1991, The Commissioner Allowed The Appeal & It Was Held That The Applicant Is Entitled To Treat The Unabsorbed Depreciation As Loss. Thereupon, The Department Carried The Matter In Appeal By Filing Ita.No.728/Hyd/1992 Before The Tribunal. The Tribunal Allowed The Appeal Through Its Order, Dated 28.08.1995 & Took The View That The Unabsorbed Depreciation Cannot Be Treated As Loss For The Purpose Of Section 115-J Of The Act.

Section 115Section 143(1)Section 155Section 256(1)

depreciation, for the purposes of Section 115-J of the I.T.Act, 1961? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in confirming the action of the Income Tax Officer who made adjustments to the income admitted while passing an order u/s. 143(1) of the I.T.Act?” Heard Sri A.V.A

M/s.V.R.Farms Pvt Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/272/2008HC Telangana28 Nov 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

207 imposes the liability for payment of advance tax and that section 208 stipulates that the advance tax must be paid in the ITA Nos. 402/2005 & Others Page No.14 of 44 financial year itself. Section 209 prescribes the mode of computation of advance tax and, as per sub-clause (d) of sub-section (1) thereof, only the amount

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX R.MUNDRY vs. A.VENKATESWARLU AND OTHERS

The appeal is allowed in the above terms with no

ITTA/14/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: The Assessing Officer (Ao) & Claimed Depreciation Allowance On The Increased Cost Of The Plant & Machinery Due To Exchange Fluctuations. The Ao In The Assessment Order Dated 31St March 1997 Rejected The Above Claim.

Section 43Section 43A

depreciation allowance on increased cost of plant and machinery due to exchange rate fluctuation. The CIT (A) referred to the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Ltd [1994] 207 ITR 718 (Cal); the decision of Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hindustan Aluminum Corporation Ltd. [1994] 207

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, vs. M/S. SAVIJANA SEA FOODS PVT. LTD.,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/55/2010HC Telangana20 Dec 2024

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Section 260

depreciation, reserves, etc., a part of it should in all fairness go to the employees.” 30. In the said case the Supreme Court was considering whether payment for ITA 210/2003 & connected matters Page 17 of 36 the extra services rendered by an employee could be allowed as business expenditure. It was held that for the purposes of allowing commercial

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Kokivenkateswara Reddy AND others,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/210/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260

depreciation, reserves, etc., a part of it should in all fairness go to the employees.” 30. In the said case the Supreme Court was considering whether payment for ITA 210/2003 & connected matters Page 17 of 36 the extra services rendered by an employee could be allowed as business expenditure. It was held that for the purposes of allowing commercial

The Commissioner of Income Tax V vs. Smt. Ch. Uma

ITTA/227/2013HC Telangana10 Jul 2013
For Appellant: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD

207, 227 of 2013, 92 & 93 of 2014 Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2021 Bechu Kurian Thomas, J. This batch of appeals relates to the assessment years 2004-05 till 2009-10. The issues raised in all these appeals are similar if not identical and hence we heard these appeals together. Except in two appeals, the questions raised

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Ch.Veeraju AND co.

ITTA/207/2013HC Telangana05 Jul 2013
For Appellant: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD

207, 227 of 2013, 92 & 93 of 2014 Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2021 Bechu Kurian Thomas, J. This batch of appeals relates to the assessment years 2004-05 till 2009-10. The issues raised in all these appeals are similar if not identical and hence we heard these appeals together. Except in two appeals, the questions raised

Commissioner of Income Tax - VI vs. M/s. S.P. Steels

ITTA/200/2013HC Telangana04 Jul 2013
For Appellant: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD

207, 227 of 2013, 92 & 93 of 2014 Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2021 Bechu Kurian Thomas, J. This batch of appeals relates to the assessment years 2004-05 till 2009-10. The issues raised in all these appeals are similar if not identical and hence we heard these appeals together. Except in two appeals, the questions raised