BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 481clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Mumbai43Chennai42Delhi40Kolkata27Cuttack14Bangalore12Jaipur11Hyderabad11Ahmedabad8Visakhapatnam5Chandigarh5Surat4Panaji3Cochin3Telangana3Pune3Patna2Lucknow2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Amritsar1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 158B4Section 4813Condonation of Delay2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. RASA AGROTECH PRIVATE LTD.

Accordingly, the appeals are liable to be dismissed on the

ITTA/453/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 113Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 158BSection 260A

Section 260A of the Act. Therefore, the last date for filing the appeals was 26th October 2007. Keeping that view if the actual dates for filing of the two appeals are taken into consideration then the actual delay works out to far more than what is claimed by the Revenue. As far as ITA No. 453 of 2012 is concerned

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV, vs. M/s. Prabhat AGri Bio Tech Limited

ITTA/6/2016HC Telangana03 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 454Section 481

condonation of 58 days delay in filing the application under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956. 2. For reasons

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. Prasad Film Laboratories Limited,

ITTA/275/2012HC Telangana10 Jul 2013

condoned.  Otherwise also, the minor age of helpless claimant  in these appeals is certainly a sufficient cause for delay in filing  Cross­objections.  Therefore, Civil Application No. 14171 of 2017  and Civil Application No. 2757 of 2018 are disposed of as allowed  and Cross­objections filed by claimant are taken on record. 16. After hearing both the sides, following points arise