Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka170 Mumbai163 Chennai104 Delhi75 Kolkata74 Bangalore57 Calcutta38 Cuttack29 Jaipur29 Pune28 Raipur27 Hyderabad21 Chandigarh20 Ahmedabad16 Visakhapatnam14 Varanasi13 Cochin13 Panaji11 SC10 Telangana9 Surat9 Lucknow6 Indore6 Andhra Pradesh6 Rajkot5 Allahabad5 Kerala4 Amritsar4 Patna3 Nagpur3 Agra2 Punjab & Haryana2 Rajasthan1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 Guwahati1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 2609 Section 143(1)(a)4 Search & Seizure4 Section 1483 Section 143(3)3 Section 1543 Section 403 Limitation/Time-bar3 Condonation of Delay

SLS Developers vs. The Income Tax Officer

ITTA/5/2026HC Telangana29 Jan 2026

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

For Appellant: Sri A V Raghu RamFor Respondent: Ms. B Sapan Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel

condoned the delay. The appellant prays for the same through the instant appeal filed under Section 260-A ol'lncome

The Commissioner of Income Tax [Central] vs. Smt P Sujana

The appeal stands disposed of as indicated above

ITTA/280/2015HC Telangana16 Jul 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 119(2)(b)

3

Section 143(3)

Section 154

Section 260

Section 260A

260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 27.02.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.351/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007 PRAYING TO 1. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. 2. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF - 2 - THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 27.02.2015 BEARING ITA NO.351/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR

Majeti Madhavi vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Central)

THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED

ITTA/331/2022HC Telangana21 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

For Appellant: SRI DUNDU SASHANK, Learned Counsel appearingFor Respondent: SRI K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, Learned Standing

Section 260Section 260A(2)(a)

condone the delay of days 42 in filing the above appeal, as otherwise the Petitioner/Appellant will be put to irreparable loss and severe hardship. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI DUNDU SASHANK, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of SRI DUNDU MANMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent: SRI K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, Learned Standing Counsel for the lncome Tax Department The Court delivered

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, vs. M/s Trinity Advanced Software Labs Private Limited,

In the result, we do not find any merit in the appeal

ITTA/421/2015HC Telangana01 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 195Section 260Section 40

260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short) has been filed by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2006-07. The appeal was admitted by a Bench of this Court on the following substantial questions of law: "a) Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding

The Director of Income Tax, (Exemptions) vs. Royal Education Society

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITTA/392/2016HC Telangana20 Oct 2016

Bench: ANIS,SANJAY KUMAR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260A

260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 29.02.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.1372/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007- 08, PRAYING TO: 2 (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT

EVEREST ORGANICS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T., HYDERABAD

ITTA/9/2005HC Telangana21 Sept 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 143(1)(a)

260- A of the IT Act wherein the following substantial question of law was framed by this Court on 13-12-2013 : i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Assessing Officer can be said to have been passed on the dictates/ directions of the superior authorities; ii)Even if it is taken that

C. SANYASI RAJU vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIZAG.

ITTA/7/2005HC Telangana21 Nov 2017

Bench: C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Section 143(1)(a)

260- A of the IT Act wherein the following substantial question of law was framed by this Court on 13-12-2013 : i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Assessing Officer can be said to have been passed on the dictates/ directions of the superior authorities; ii)Even if it is taken that

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. M/s.Samrakshna Electricals Ltd

ITTA/28/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 143(1)(a)

260- A of the IT Act wherein the following substantial question of law was framed by this Court on 13-12-2013 : i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Assessing Officer can be said to have been passed on the dictates/ directions of the superior authorities; ii)Even if it is taken that

M/s.GVK Petro Chemicals Private Limited,(Novo Resins AND vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,

ITTA/8/2005HC Telangana05 Jul 2012

Section 143(1)(a)

260- A of the IT Act wherein the following substantial question of law was framed by this Court on 13-12-2013 : i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Assessing Officer can be said to have been passed on the dictates/ directions of the superior authorities; ii)Even if it is taken that