BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,324Delhi1,187Jaipur434Chennai381Kolkata379Bangalore324Hyderabad245Ahmedabad240Surat137Indore121Pune116Chandigarh104Cochin80Nagpur79Rajkot70Raipur54Amritsar47Visakhapatnam46Calcutta46Cuttack46Lucknow36Ranchi34Patna28Guwahati28Karnataka22Jodhpur19Agra18Panaji14Allahabad14Dehradun13Jabalpur8Telangana6Varanasi5SC4Orissa2Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Kerala1Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2454Section 214Section 1323Section 234B3Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 132(4)2Section 153A2Survey u/s 133A2

SRI PRASANCHAND SURANA SEC.BAD

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/60/2000HC Telangana26 Jun 2013
Section 132Section 139Section 154Section 158BSection 254Section 254(2)

undisclosed income was reduced to Rs. 59,42,186/-. 2.2 Being aggrieved by the order, the assessee preferred appeal before the ITAT and the Tribunal vide impugned order directed the A.O to take the sale consideration as per sale deeds in relation to sale of six plots by assessee for the purpose of calculating capital gains

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sri Nama Nageshwar Rao

ITTA/23/2021
Undisclosed Income2
Capital Gains2
HC Telangana
09 Oct 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 260A

capital gain on the ground that the evidences found during search at the premises of entry provider cannot be the basis for making additions in assessment completed u/S. 153A in the case of beneficiary ignoring the vital fact that there was a common search u/s 132 conducted on the same day in both the cases of the entry provider

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Sri Anil Harnathka

ITTA/24/2014HC Telangana04 Apr 2016

Bench: The Tribunal & The Tribunal On The Ground Of The Assessee'S Mother Having Filed A Return Conceding Capital Gains, Set Aside The Addition Of Rs.60 Lakhs As Against The Assessee. By Annexure-A, The Assessment Of The Assessee Was Completed Taking As Undisclosed Income, Various Credits In The Bank Account Between 08.08.2005 & 23.11.2005. Out Of The Total Amount Of Rs.98,18,244/-, Rs.60,00,000/- According To The Assessee Represented The Unaccounted Receipt On The Sale Of The Property By His Mother. The Property Is Said To Have Actually Fetched Rs.74,00,000/- & The Mother, The Owner Of

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIFor Respondent: SHRI HARRI JOSEPH
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

capital gains, set aside the addition of Rs.60 lakhs as against the assessee. By Annexure-A, the assessment of the assessee was completed taking as undisclosed income

Sampathirao Apparao vs. Income Tax Officer,

The appeals stand dismissed

ITTA/20/2012HC Telangana19 Jul 2013
Section 132(4)Section 132BSection 140ASection 153ASection 234BSection 260

undisclosed income of Rs.77,25,000/- as short term capital gain arising on account of sale of a residential property

PRL COMMR OF INCOME TAX, RJY, E.G.DIST vs. M/S KADAKATLA RICE MILL, TADEPALLIGUDEM, W.G.DIST

ITTA/289/2017HC Telangana06 Dec 2017

Bench: The Income Tax Settlement Commission/Respondent No. 1 On 8Th April, 2015 For Settlement Of Its Income Tax Matters By Disclosing An Income Of Rs. 3,93,93,544/-. The Aforesaid Application Of The Respondent No. 2 Was Proceeded With Under Section 245 D (1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By An Order Dated 21St April, 2015. After Receipt Of The Report Under Section 245 D (2B) Of The Act, From The

Section 245

undisclosed income of the assessee/respondent no. 2. Against the aforesaid Report under Rule 9 of Income Tax Settlement Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1997 assessee/respondent no. 2 filed objection by submitting that the petitioner/Commissioner of Income Tax concerned has not cited any instance which could raise a bona fide doubt on the intention of the respondent no. 2 or its application under

The Commissioner of Income TAx-IV, vs. M/s. Mahaveer Enterprises (India) Limited

The Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/94/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 21

capital gains on transfers, to invest unaccounted money (`black money') and to avoid payment of `unearned increases' due to Development Authorities on transfer. 2. The modus operandi in such SA/GPA/WILL transactions is for the vendor or person claiming to be the owner to receive the agreed consideration, deliver possession of the property to the purchaser and execute the following documents