BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 248clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi469Mumbai355Chennai130Karnataka109Bangalore107Ahmedabad72Jaipur72Cochin57Calcutta51Pune45Kolkata44Visakhapatnam41Raipur39Hyderabad38Chandigarh32Nagpur20Cuttack19Ranchi16Indore15Surat11Panaji11Rajkot9Amritsar9Lucknow7Dehradun6Telangana6SC5Patna3Rajasthan3Agra1Andhra Pradesh1Varanasi1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 8019Section 41(1)6Section 2606Section 80H3Section 80I2Section 3022Section 3642Section 2012Deduction2

INCOME TAX BANGALORE vs. SHALINI BHUPAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/38/2000HC Telangana20 Jun 2013
Section 260Section 80Section 80HSection 80ISection 80J

capital of not less than five hundred thousand rupees; (iii) the hotel is for the time being approved for the purposes of this sub-section by the Central Government; (iv) the business of the hotel starts functioning after the 31st day of March, 1981, but before the 1st day of April [1991]. [(4A) This section applies to the business

M/S.P.SATYANARAYANA AND SONS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1[9], HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITTA/209/2008
HC Telangana
08 Sept 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260

248 of the Act. The Appellate Authority sought for a remand report from the Assessing Officer. The claim of the assessee was that the payment was in the nature of reimbursement of expenses. Hence, it was not liable to deduct tax under Section 195(1) of the Act. Further, the payments are not in the nature of royalty. The Appellate

The Commissioner of Income Tax - I vs. Aditya Music (India) Ltd.

ITTA/248/2012HC Telangana06 Aug 2013
For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: LATE SRI RAJESH KUMAR T.R
Section 41(1)

Section 41(1) of the Act specifically speaks inter alia of a deduction made in the assessment for any year in respect of a trading liability incurred by the ITA.No.248 of 2012 - 5 - assessee to be deemed to be profits and gains of business or profession and accordingly chargeable to income tax. In the subject assessment year, obviously

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

ITTA/147/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
For Appellant: - Sri Yug Mohit Chaudhary assistedFor Respondent: - A.G.A., Sri Amit Mishra, Sri Gyan
Section 156(3)Section 201Section 302Section 363Section 364Section 366Section 376

Section 27 begins with a proviso and states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered, in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered may be proved, 49 whether it amounts to a confession

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. M/s Hyderabad House Pvt Ltd.,

ITTA/250/2013HC Telangana11 Jul 2013

capitalizing it with the multiplier of 14 on the basis of age of the claimant mother (44 years old) in view of dicta in Amrit Bhanu Shali & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., (2012) 11 SCC 738. 14. The claimants by their appeal (MAC appeal No. 881/2015) submit that the non-pecuniary heads of damages have not been property taken

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

ITTA/3/2020HC Telangana25 Aug 2020

Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since, HVL became