BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 156clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai553Delhi536Bangalore246Chennai172Ahmedabad136Karnataka119Jaipur104Kolkata104Raipur75Cochin73Hyderabad73Calcutta52Chandigarh45Panaji39Pune36Indore23Surat22Lucknow20Nagpur20SC15Rajkot14Agra13Cuttack10Visakhapatnam7Telangana7Dehradun6Varanasi5Ranchi5Amritsar4Rajasthan3Allahabad2Jabalpur2Jodhpur1Orissa1Gauhati1Patna1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 9(1)(vi)5Section 260A3Section 43Section 143(3)2Section 1432Section 3022Section 3642Section 2012

The Commissioner of Income Tax - III, vs. M/s. Suven Pharmaceuticals Limited,

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/677/2006HC Telangana21 Mar 2012
Section 115JSection 143Section 208Section 260A

156 and the provisions of this  Act shall apply accordingly; (ii) in   a   case   where   the   interest   is  reduced,   the   excess   interest   paid,   if  any, shall be refunded. Page 6 of 15 O/TAXAP/676/2006 JUDGMENT (5) The   provisions   of   this   section   shall  apply   in   respect   of   assessments   for   the  assessment year commencing on the 1st day of  April, 1989 and subsequent

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, vs. Sri Prem Chand

ITTA/380/2006HC Telangana
02 Feb 2012
Section 4

156 ITR 497 (SC) at p.508, their Lordships held as under:- “Facts should be viewed in natural perspective, having regard to the compulsion of the circumstances of the case. Whether it is possible to draw two inference from the facts and whether there is no evidence of any dishonest or improper motive on the part of the assessee, it would

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

ITTA/147/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
For Appellant: - Sri Yug Mohit Chaudhary assistedFor Respondent: - A.G.A., Sri Amit Mishra, Sri Gyan
Section 156(3)Section 201Section 302Section 363Section 364Section 366Section 376

Capital) Appeal No. 1475 of 2009 corresponding to Reference No. 3 of 2009, by a co-ordinate bench of this Court on 11th September, 2009. The judgment of this Court in 'XYZ' has been affirmed by the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. (s). 2227 of 2010, decided on 15.2.2011, with summary dismissal of appeal. 15. Separate and distinct trials

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Laila Impex,

Accordingly answered against the Revenue. The appeals fail and are dismissed, without

ITTA/473/2012HC Telangana09 Jul 2013
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 260ASection 9(1)(vi)

Capital gains") for— (i) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence) in respect of a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property ; (ii) the imparting of any information concerning the working of, or the use of, a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sri P.Sarveswara Rao

Appeals are partly allowed, in view of the

ITTA/434/2005HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 221Section 4

gains under Case I of Schedule D. It is sufficient to cite the decision of this House in the sugar beet case (Smart v. Lincolnshire Sugar Co. Ltd. [1937] 20 TC 643; 156 LT 25] as an illustration. The second proposition constitutes an exception. If the undertaker is a rating authority and the subsidy is the proceeds of rates imposed

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

ITTA/3/2020HC Telangana25 Aug 2020

Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since, HVL became

M/s Durga Granites, vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 1,

ITTA/30/2023HC Telangana04 Sept 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

gain as General Manager (HR&A) "Bidyut Unnayan Bhaban", Plot No. 3/C, LA Block, Sector-III, P.O. - Salt Lake City, P.S.- Bidhannagar, District- Kolkata, West Bengal, PIN – 700106 ..........Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, having its office at Yojna Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi (Jharkhand