BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 36(1)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi988Mumbai864Bangalore455Chennai311Kolkata159Ahmedabad133Karnataka129Chandigarh125Hyderabad71Jaipur69Cochin63Raipur61Indore44Rajkot32Ranchi28Pune27Lucknow27Jabalpur24Surat23Cuttack22Guwahati19Dehradun17Visakhapatnam14Nagpur14Jodhpur11Agra9Patna7SC6Kerala5Varanasi5Allahabad4Panaji3Telangana3J&K1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 2608Section 194J3Section 2012Section 201(1)2Deduction2TDS2

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. M/s. Celestial Laboratories Limited,

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITTA/303/2013HC Telangana17 Jul 2013
Section 133ASection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 260Section 260A

vii) of sub-section (1) of section 9; (ba) "royalty" shall have the same meaning as in Explanation 2 to clause (vi) of sub-section (1) of section 9; (c) where any sum referred to in sub- section (1) is credited to any account, whether called "suspense account" or by any other name, in the books of account

M/S.P.SATYANARAYANA AND SONS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1[9], HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITTA/209/2008HC Telangana08 Sept 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260

TDS at 20% under Section 195(1) of the Act and also paid the same to Government account. However, according to the assessee, since it is a cost sharing agreement and payments were made by the assesee for reimbursement of cost/expenses, no 16 income is embedded therein. Therefore, the assessee is not liable to deduct tax under Section 195(1

Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Sigma Constructions

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITTA/502/2013HC Telangana24 Oct 2013
Section 260Section 36(1)(vii)

Section 36(1)(vii) of the Act and the expenditure relating to prior period could not be claimed in the guise of bad debts. In support of aforesaid submission, reliance has been placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in 'GOETZE INDIA LTD. Vs. CIT' 284 ITR 323. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the assessee