BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 194C(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai674Delhi630Kolkata434Bangalore284Chennai184Ahmedabad144Jaipur114Hyderabad89Cochin75Chandigarh62Pune58Indore55Karnataka50Raipur49Cuttack48Visakhapatnam45Rajkot42Nagpur40Amritsar30Jodhpur24Surat22Patna18Panaji18Jabalpur16Lucknow16Allahabad15Ranchi14Guwahati14Agra8Kerala8Telangana7Calcutta5SC5Dehradun4Varanasi3Rajasthan2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 194C10Section 2608Section 194I8Section 2637Deduction6Section 201(1)5TDS5Section 12A3Section 2013Section 194J

M\S.CHENNAKESAVA VIJAYAWADA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIJAYAWAD

The Appeal is dismissed

ITTA/33/2000HC Telangana27 Aug 2012

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 194CSection 197(1)Section 201

5 Whether it is to be circulated to civil judge ? ========================================================= ESSAR OIL LTD. - Appellant(s) Versus INCOME-TAXOFFICER - Opponent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR JP SHAH for Appellant MR MANISH R BHATT Sr Advocate with Mrs MAUNA M BHATT for Opponent ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI 3rd September 2012 CAV JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE SONIA

Mr. Vasamsetty Veera Venkata Satyanarayana vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -1

Appeal stands dismissed

3
Penalty2
ITTA/13/2025
HC Telangana
19 Mar 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 12ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 263

TDS deducted Non deduction Mela mandir Security Expenses (u/s194C) (Apka Electric & Decoration centre TSS security expenses 46,000/- 8,28,771/- 460/- 8287/- Nil 8,747/- Mela Tent Decoration expenses (194C) (Apka Electric & Decoration centre) 4,17,885/- 4178/- Nil 4,178/- Mela Mandir Roshni expenses (194C) Apka Electric & Decoration centre) 4,92,940/- 4,929/- Nil 4,929/- Mela

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agricultural Market committee,

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/422/2011HC Telangana17 Nov 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,SANJAY KUMAR

Section 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 28Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS. 2. While admitting the matter following questions were framed:- 1. Whether Tribunal was justified in holding that the payment made by the assessee in form of transmission/ wheeling/ SLDC charges were not liable to be deducted at source either under Section 194J or 194C of the Income Tax Act? 2. Whether Tribunal was justified in holding -2- that

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. Aditya Music (India) Pvt.Ltd.,

ITTA/482/2012HC Telangana06 Aug 2013
Section 194CSection 194ISection 201(1)Section 271C

TDS Circle, Patna, by his order dated 19.01.2011 under Section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act held that the deduction ought to have been made by the assessee under Section 194I of the Act and accordingly directed further amounts of Rs.5,04,86,721/- to be deposited by the assessee including the amount of interest on short deduction

Commissioner of Income Tax, Guntur. vs. Agricultural Market Committee, Parchuru

ITTA/480/2012HC Telangana02 Aug 2013
Section 194CSection 194ISection 201(1)Section 271C

TDS Circle, Patna, by his order dated 19.01.2011 under Section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act held that the deduction ought to have been made by the assessee under Section 194I of the Act and accordingly directed further amounts of Rs.5,04,86,721/- to be deposited by the assessee including the amount of interest on short deduction

Commissioner of Income tax-V, vs. M/s. INTRACK INC,

ITTA/590/2013HC Telangana06 Dec 2013
Section 260

194C; (v) “rent” shall have the same meaning as in clause (i) to the Explanation to section 194-I; (vi) “royalty” shall have the same meaning as in Explanation 2 to clause (vi) of sub- section (1) of section 9; By Finance Act, 2010, the said provision is substituted by the following: Substituted by the Finance Act, 2010, w.e.f

The Commissioner of Income Tax I vs. Mesmer Technologies Ltd

The appeals are allowed in part

ITTA/673/2016HC Telangana15 Dec 2016

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,M.S.K.JAISWAL

Section 12ASection 194JSection 260Section 260A

5. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under Section 201 of the Act for the assessment years under consideration on the ground that the appellant ought to have deducted tax at source on payments made to KIADB and passed separate orders holding that - 7 - the appellant, as an assessee in default under Section 201(1), levied interest under Section