COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, HYDERABAD vs. M/S. PATNI TELECOM SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

TDS Under Section 194A. 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemptions Under Section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application for the registration of the co-operative society and those

The Commissioner of Income Tax I vs. Mesmer Technologies Ltd

The appeals are allowed in part

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,M.S.K.JAISWAL

1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any sum by way of – (a) fees for professional services, or (b) fees for technical services, or [(ba) any remuneration or fees or commission by whatever name called, other than those on which tax is deductible under section

M\S.CHENNAKESAVA VIJAYAWADA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIJAYAWAD

The Appeal is dismissed

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

TDS was deductible from the entire payment made to Messrs. Essar TAXAP/33/2000 6/27 JUDGMENT Projects Limited for the construction of refinery. When this issue travelled to the Tribunal, it concurred with the findings of the CIT [A] by discussing at length not only the order of CIT [A] but also independently examining the issue and in terms held that there

Commissioner of Income Tax V vs. C Eswar Reddy AND Co.,

The appeals stand dismissed answering all the

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

TDS default for the relevant assessment year to be Rs.1,36,040/- and the Assessing Officer was directed to pass revised order under Section 201 of the Act. Similarly, reckoning the deduction made under Annexure-9 produced in M.A. No. 452 of 2015, the Commissioner restricted the penalty under Section 271C to Rs.74,669/-. Both the orders of the Commissioner

The Commissioner of Income Tax -11 vs. The AP Mineral Development Corporation Ltd

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

1 SIR SIDDAPPA KAMBLI ROAD HUBLI 580020, PAN: AAAAH 0120P. ... RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE : 2 : ORDERS DATED 20.3.2015, PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE, IN C.O. NO.25/BANG/2015, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs. Mrs. Urmila Singh

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS, GROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS, RUA – DEFENDANT – OUREM, PANAJI – GOA – 403001. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) TDS WARD, C R BUILDING ANNEXE, P.B. ROAD, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI 580025. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND : M/S. THE RADDI SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA HEAD OFFICE BANK ROAD, DHARWAD – 580 001. PAN : AAAAT 3297K. ... RESPONDENT