PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 vs. ABHISAR BUILDWELL P. LTD

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

reassessments which had abated under CA No. 6580/2021 Etc. Page 15 of 59 the second proviso to Sub-Section 1 shall stand revived w.e.f. the date of receipt of the order of such annulment. (viii) This revival is notwithstanding anything contained under Sub-Section 1 of Section 153A or Section 153. The proviso to Section 153A(2

VINUBHAI MOHANLAL DOBARIA vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

15% reckoned from the day immediately following the specified date notwithstanding the fact that the Assessing Officer has extended the date for furnishing of return. SLP (C) NO. 20519 of 2024 Page 33 of 59 39. Accepting the contention of the respondents would mean that the commission of an offence under Section 276CC is made contingent upon the filing

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS vs. M/S CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

reassessment in the jurisdictional area where the import concerned has been affected, either by the Board or the Commissioner of Customs, in terms of Review Petition No. 400 of 2021 Page 16 of 161 Section 2(34) of the Act, 1962, was competent to issue notice under Section 28 of the Act, 1962. 14. It appears from the decision

M/S.JASWAL NECO LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

15 Page 16 JUDGMENT (ii) That the importer at the time of clearance of the imported materials executes a bond with such surety or security and in such form and for such sum as may be specified by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs binding himself to pay on demand an amount equal to the duty leviable, but for the exemption

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

15 Page 16 JUDGMENT held that even after Section 24B was enacted tax cannot be assessed on receipts on the footing that it is the personal income of the legal representative. This Court held:- “It was then urged that apart from section 24B, the legal representatives of a deceased person also represent his estate in the matter of taxation

GENPACT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

15 (i) section 221, or (ii) section 271, section 271A, section 271B, section 272A, section 272AA or section 272BB; (iii)section 272, section 272B or section 273, as they stood immediately before the 1st day of April, 1989, in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1988, or any earlier assessment years

COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM vs. SMT. LUCY KOCHUVAREED

The appeals are allowed, but in the circumstances of the case we make no

15, 1963, proposing to revise suo motu the assessment for the said two year son the ground that the deductions allowed were excessive and without any proper basis as a result of which Rs. 16,800/-for the year 1959-60, and Rs. 25,800/-for 1960-61 had "escaped assessment". The respondent was asked to file objections

BRIJ LAL vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

reassessment, tax shall be calculated on the aggregate of the total income as assessed in the earlier proceeding for assessment under section 143 or section 144 or section 147 and the income disclosed in the application as if such aggregate were the total 1 income. FORM NO. 34B [See rules 44C and 44CA] Form of application for settlement of case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHELF DRILLING RON TAPPMEYER LIMITED

The appeals are allowed

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

reassessment or recomputation which is twenty-one months subject to the provisos therein when an assessment is made under Sections 143 or 144 of the Act; that, in a case where Section 92C applies, sub-section (4) of Section 153 may have expressly extended the limitation period by twelve months which is by way of a recent amendment

THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS vs. M/S M.M. RUBBER & CO

15 of the U.P. Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, it was held that for an aggrieved party the limitation will run from the date when the order was communicated to him. The ratio of these judgments were applied in interpret- ing section 33A(2) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 in Muthia Chettiar v. CIT, ILR 1951 Mad. 815 with

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. RAJESH JHAVERI STOCK BROKERS PVT.LTD

The appeal is allowed without

reassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Assessing Officer shall serve on the assessee a notice containing all or any of the requirements which may be included in a notice under sub- section (2) of section 139; and the provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if the notice were a notice issued under

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,SIMLA vs. M/S GREEN WORLD CORPORATION

Appeals are disposed of with the aforementioned directions

15 and 16 of 2006) filed by the assessee, i.e. M/s The Green World Corporation, are dismissed.” 17. Mr. Harish N. Salve and Mr. Sunil Gupta, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Assessee inter alia would submit: i. Having regard to the order of transfer passed by CBDT transferring the case from CIT (Shimla) to CIT (Delhi

INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. VIKRAM SUJITKUMAR BHATIA

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

reassess income of such other person in accordance with the provisions of Section 153A. It also further provided that in case of such other person, the reference to the date of initiation of the search under Section 132 or making of requisition under Section 132-A in the second proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 153-A shall

M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS, KOTTAYAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM

Bench: This Court & On Leave Being Granted, Civil Appeals Have Been Registered. 3.

Section 144/147 of the Act determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.25,06,660.00. Thereafter allocation of income was made amongst the partners in the manner indicated in the order of reassessment. 8 15. At this stage, we may mention that the assessing officer had worked out the escaped income for the three assessment years

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI vs. M/S. ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

2) and (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).   The statutory scheme   as   delineated   by   Section   14A   has   to   be   understood before correctly appreciating the nature and purport of Rule 8D.  Section 14A was first inserted by Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective   effect   w.e.f.   01.04.1962.     Section   14A   as originally inserted reads as under

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,CHENNAI vs. M/S ALAGENDRAN FINANCE LTD

2) of the 1922 Act (corresponding to Section 148 of the Act) the previous under assessment is set aside and the ITO has the jurisdiction and duty to levy tax on the entire income that had escaped assessment during the previous year\005The judgment in Jaganmohan Rao’s case, therefore, cannot be read to imply as laying down that

PARASHURAM POTTERY WORKS CO. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1, WARD 'A', RAJKOT,GUJARAT

15) ACT: Income Tax Act, 1961--Secs. 147, 148, 149, Income Tax Act 1922--Sec. 10(2) vi--Reopening of assessment--Omission on the part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts--Duty to disclose primary facts--Duty to draw references of I.T.O.--Whether I.T.O. can correct his error or give effect to change in his opinion

BASHESHAR NATH vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,DELHI & RAJASTHAN & ANOTHER

The appeal is allowed

reassessment proceeding relating to taxation on income or in any other proceeding before any Court or other authority any matter which forms part of such settlement. (4) Where a settlement has been accepted by Government under sub-section (1), no proceedings under section 34 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 (XI of 1922), or under section 15