BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

83 results for “reassessment”

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,628Mumbai3,359Chennai1,202Ahmedabad858Kolkata779Jaipur656Hyderabad601Bangalore601Pune471Raipur457Chandigarh405Indore294Rajkot260Surat237Amritsar212Cochin198Patna177Visakhapatnam171Cuttack150Agra147Nagpur146Guwahati109Ranchi107Lucknow91Dehradun89Jodhpur83SC83Allahabad48Panaji34Jabalpur16Varanasi9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 14732Reassessment26Section 14822Addition to Income18Limitation/Time-bar18Section 8016Deduction16Section 143(3)15Section 41(1)15Section 132

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 vs. ABHISAR BUILDWELL P. LTD

C.A. No.-006580-006580 - 2021Supreme Court24 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 153ASection 2(45)Section 4Section 5

reassessment made u/s 153A(1) stands annulled in appeal or any other legal proceeding, the assessments and reassessments which had abated

M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS, KOTTAYAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM

C.A. No.-008580-008582 - 2011Supreme Court23 Jan 2024

Bench: This Court & On Leave Being Granted, Civil Appeals Have Been Registered. 3.

Section 143

Showing 1–20 of 83 · Page 1 of 5

12
Section 143(2)12
Penalty10
Section 147
Section 148
Section 260A

reassess. The assessing officer has no power to review; he has the power to reassess. But 39 reassessment has to be based

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHELF DRILLING RON TAPPMEYER LIMITED

The appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-010586-010589 - 2025Supreme Court08 Aug 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 144CSection 153Section 153(1)Section 44B

reassessment, the period available for completion of assessment or reassessment, as the case may be, under the said sub- sections

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,CHENNAI vs. M/S ALAGENDRAN FINANCE LTD

C.A. No.-003301-003301 - 2007Supreme Court27 Jul 2007
For Respondent: M/s. Alagendran Finance Ltd
Section 143Section 148Section 263

reassessment were initiated by the assessing officer on 05.03.2004. Orders of reassessment were passed on 28.03.2002. Proceedings for reassessment, however

K.M. SHARMA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 13(7),NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed

C.A. No.-007742-007742 - 1997Supreme Court11 Apr 2002
For Respondent: INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 13(7)NEW DELHI
Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 150Section 150(1)Section 18Section 6

reassessment proceedings. Section 150 (1) states that the period of limitation prescribed in Section 149 is not applicable, if the reassessment

A.L.A. FIRM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

- 0Supreme Court21 Feb 1991
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS
Section 147Section 148Section 23(2)

reassessment proceedings was not justified. It was contended for the Revenue, that the reassessment proceedings would 635 be valid even

COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM vs. SMT. LUCY KOCHUVAREED

The appeals are allowed, but in the circumstances of the case we make no

- 0Supreme Court07 May 1976
For Respondent: SMT. LUCY KOCHUVAREED
Section 34

reassessment may be made shall apply to a reassessment made under section 19 or to an assessment or reassessment made

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGALCALCUTTA & ANR. vs. HEMCHANDRA KAR & ORS

- 0Supreme Court16 Apr 1970
For Respondent: HEMCHANDRA KAR & ORS

reassessment. When he was in possession of all facts and proceeded to make the reassessment by including the, amount in the individual

INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. VIKRAM SUJITKUMAR BHATIA

C.A. No.-000911-000911 - 2022Supreme Court06 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

reassess income of such other person in accordance with the provisions of Section 153A, Provided that in case of such

ASSOCIATED STONE INDUSTRIES (KOTAH) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJASTHAN

The appeal is disposed of as above and the matter is

- 0Supreme Court05 Feb 1997
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJASTHAN
Section 18ASection 34(1)Section 34(1)(b)

reassessment under Section 34(1)(a) of the Act were absent. The Tribunal further held that the proceedings for reassessment

R. S. A. C. KASI IYER vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MYSORE, TRAVANCORE-COCH

- 0Supreme Court01 Sept 1960
For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MYSORE, TRAVANCORE-COCHIN
Section 8(2)

reassessment proceedings Travancore Income-tax Regulation VIII of 1096 M. E.-Travancore Taxation on income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1124 M. E. s. 8, sub-ss. (2), (4),(5), (6)-Opium

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 14 vs. JASJIT SINGH

The appeals are dismissed in terms of signed

C.A. No.-006566-006566 - 2023Supreme Court26 Sept 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Section 132Section 132ASection 139Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 151Section 153Section 153(1)Section 153A

reassess the total income of six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) CIRCLE 1(2) vs. M/S M.R. SHAH LOGISTICS PVT. LTD

Appeal is allowed in these terms, without order on costs

C.A. No.-002453-002453 - 2022Supreme Court28 Mar 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(1)Section 147

reassessment or recomputation under this section, the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. RAJESH JHAVERI STOCK BROKERS PVT.LTD

The appeal is allowed without

C.A. No.-002830-002830 - 2007Supreme Court23 May 2007
For Respondent: Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd
Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)

reassessment proceedings was valid and he had jurisdiction to undertake such an exercise. It is in the aforesaid backdrop of facts

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, U.P. vs. GURBUX RAI HARBUX RAI

- 0Supreme Court24 Aug 1971
For Respondent: GURBUX RAI HARBUX RAI
Section 10A

reassessment of excess profits tax. Under s. 15, if in consequence of definite information which has come into his possession

SUNDARAM & COMPANY (P.) LTD. MADURAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

- 0Supreme Court25 Apr 1967
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

reassess such income, profits or gains or recompute the loss or depreciation allowance; and the provisions of this Act shall

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS vs. M/S CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

R.P.(C) No.-000400 - 2021Supreme Court07 Nov 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

reassessment in the jurisdictional area where the import concerned has been affected, either by the Board or the Commissioner of Customs

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-005802-005802 - 2005Supreme Court29 Jul 2015
Section 11Section 11ASection 4(3)(a)

reassessment or recomputation under section 147) of the income of the deceased and for the purpose of levying any sum in the hands

BRIJ LAL vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

C.A. No.-000516-000527 - 2004Supreme Court21 Oct 2010
Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 144Section 148Section 154Section 234BSection 245D(1)Section 245D(4)Section 5

reassessment of the applicant under section 147 or by way of appeal or revision in connection with such reassessment, and the applicant

ESTATE OF LATE, RANGALAL JAJODIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX MADRAS

- 0Supreme Court19 Nov 1970
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX MADRAS

reassessment made by the Revenue Officer on Aruna Devi, the executrix was valid and that the assessments were saved from