BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,544Delhi2,763Bangalore1,198Chennai1,194Kolkata701Ahmedabad457Jaipur259Hyderabad248Karnataka205Pune195Raipur143Chandigarh130Indore106Visakhapatnam71Cochin63Surat61SC60Lucknow57Ranchi46Amritsar45Rajkot40Telangana36Cuttack30Jodhpur28Nagpur27Guwahati24Kerala16Patna10Calcutta10Allahabad8Panaji6Jabalpur5Dehradun5Agra5Varanasi5Punjab & Haryana4Orissa4Rajasthan2Tripura1Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2603Section 14A3Depreciation3Section 45(2)2Disallowance2Addition to Income2Set Off of Losses2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD.

In the result, this Income Tax Appeal is allowed, setting

ITA/11/2018HC Orissa16 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 143(3)

depreciation loss of Rs.1,88,52,496/- (pertaining to the assessment years 1996-97 to 2009-10) and loss amounting to Rs.35,85,037/- (pertaining to the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98). The total loss of Rs.1,52,76,459/- was adjusted against the taxable income of Rs.35,85,037/- for the assessment year 2011-12, whereby

ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2) vs. M/S. SERAJUDDIN AND CO.

ITA/44/2022HC Orissa15 Mar 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 26Th July, 2022 Appearance :- Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. … For Appellant Mr. S.M. Surana, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv. Md. Afzal Ansari, Adv. … For Respondent

Section 11
Section 11(1)(a)
Section 260A

depreciation. The Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has relied on the decision of the Hon’ble High Court in the case of Siliguri Regulated Market Committee (2014) 366 ITR 51, which has been accepted by the department. Moreover, on this issue, Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed departmental appeal in the case of Rajasthan and Gujarat Charitable Foundation, Poona

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

In the result, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of

ITA/33/2017HC Orissa14 Nov 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 115Section 115JSection 14Section 14ASection 260Section 45(2)

set-aside the order impugned and to restore the file to the Assessing Officer to re-examine whether the loss suffered by the assessee was disallowed in the assessment year 1988-1989 and if found in the affirmative, no addition could be made in the assessment order under consideration or in other words, it is the other

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/119/2013HC Orissa21 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 260

depreciation can be claimed etc. 11. We notice that the question really does not arise from the order of the Tribunal for the simple reason that the Tribunal has not decided the issue. Question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal only when the question is decided by the Tribunal, one way or the other. 12. Mr. Nageshwar