COMNR.OF I.TAX vs. SOUTHCO

Accordingly, the appeal (ITAT/11/2011) stands dismissed

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 18th December, 2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata in ITA No.1193/Kol/2009 for the assessment year 2001-02. The revenue has raised for the following substantial question of law for consideration: 2 i) Whether on the facts

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. OREGANISATION FOR THE RURAL WOMEN AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT

Appeal is disposed of and

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 5 of the Limitation Act filed by the appellant to condone the delay of 05 days in preferring this Tax Appeal. 2

BISWAJIT BEHERA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), BBSR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

delay of 103 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. The application shall stand disposed of. ITA 593/2023, ITA 635/2023, ITA 636/2023, ITA 638/2023, ITA 639/2023, ITA 640/2023, ITA 641/2023, ITA 642/2023, ITA 643/2023, ITA 644/2023, ITA 645/2023, ITA 652/2023, ITA 653/2023, ITA 659/2023, ITA 2/2024, ITA 3/2024, ITA 14/2023 & ITA 21/2024 1. These set of appeals arise

NEELACHAL I.NIGAM L. vs. ASST.COMNR.OF I.TAX

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

condone the delay of the proceedings which is not before it as limitation for framing of reassessment order section 147/143(3) which, in terms of section 153 of the Act (as then applicable ) lapsed on 31.03.1997. 74. The Supreme Court in Popat Bahiru Govardhane v. Land Acquisition Officer29, held thus : 16. It is a settled legal proposition that

COMNR.OF I.TAX vs. SANDY RESORTS P.LTD

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 151 CPC is for condonation of 99 days delay in refiling the appeal. MAMTA 2022.06.02 12:57 I atttest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment LPA NO. 122 of 2006(O&M) and LPA No.2327 of 2017(O&M) 2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. M/S. KNSD ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 5 of the Act, we 2 are to take note of several factors. We are also conscious of the fact that we have condoned longer period of delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. M/S.POSCO INDIA PVT.LTD.

Appeal is dismissed as

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,BHUBANESWAR vs. KUNTALA MOHAPATRA

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY

2 of 10 are allowed. Delay of 5 days in filing the appeals is condoned. Applications stand disposed of. ITA 1/2024, ITA 10/2024 and ITA 12/2024 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax1 impugns the validity of the order dated 16 May 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2 and posits the following questions of law for our consideration

THE PRINCIPAL,COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL,ANDHRA PRADESH vs. M/S NIDAN,INFRONT OF DIG OFFICE,BERHAMPUR

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

delay is condoned. I.A. No.8 of 2019 is allowed. ITA No.150 of 2018 2. The present appeal by the Revenue challenges an order dated 16th May, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (ITAT) in IT(SS) A Nos.32 to 37/ CTK/2018 for the Assessment Years (AYs) 2009-10 to 2015-16. The questions sought

THE PRINCIPAL,COMMISSIONER OF IT (CENTRAL) vs. M/S NIDAN,BERHAMPUR

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

delay is condoned. I.A. No.9 of 2019 is allowed. ITA No.155 of 2018 2. The present appeal by the Revenue challenges an order dated 16th May, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (ITAT) in IT(SS) A Nos.32 to 37/ CTK/2018 for the Assessment Years (AYs) 2009-10 to 2015-16. The questions sought

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. ORISSA STEVEDORS LTD

The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to restore the appeal in the

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 20Th February, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Sukumar Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Dipendra Nath Chunder, Adv. … For Appellant Mr. Om Narain Rai, Adv. Mr. Anurag Roy, Adv. … For Respondent The Court : This Matter Is Appearing In The Supplementary List Today. This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 1St May, 2009 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) In Ita No. 355/Kol/2009 For The Assessment Year 2005-06. The Appeal Was Admitted On 13Th February, 2012 On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law :-

2 i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the present case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law by not holding that the expenditure incurred for co-ordination charges does not come within the scope of section 30 to 36 of the Income Tax Act, and as such the assessee is entitled to get benefit of deduction