BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

66 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 43(6)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai549Delhi465Mumbai364Kolkata236Bangalore184Jaipur163Ahmedabad159Karnataka145Hyderabad138Chandigarh129Pune103Nagpur66Amritsar46Lucknow38Raipur38Indore37Calcutta37Cuttack33Surat32Cochin26SC24Visakhapatnam23Guwahati16Rajkot15Varanasi12Patna12Telangana10Allahabad9Rajasthan5Jodhpur5Dehradun5Panaji4Orissa4Ranchi1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 153C85Section 153A37Section 143(3)29Section 6826Section 26318Addition to Income16Section 25012Section 1326Section 143(2)

ANAND GOVIND THATTE,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 127/NAG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(vii)

43,800, under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act. The addition so made is illegal and liable to be deleted as per law and in the interest of justice. 4. Without prejudice, the additions made under section 56(2)(vii)(b) is highly excessive and which deserves to be substantially reduced in the interest of justice

MAYUR KHARA,YAVATMAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, NAGPUR

In the result, Both the appeals of above mentioned assessee’s are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 66 · Page 1 of 4

6
Unexplained Cash Credit6
Search & Seizure6
Undisclosed Income6
ITA 64/NAG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shri Mayur Khara Vs. The Pcit Datta Chowk Nagpur-2 Yavatmalm 445 001 (Maharastra) Pan No.:Abwpk 8869 N Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shri Amit Khara Vs. The Pcit Datta Chowk Nagpur-2 Yavatmalm 445 001 (Maharastra) Pan No.:Abwpk 8868 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri Mahavir Atal, Ca Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing: 28/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. Both These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Above Mentioned Assessees Against Two Different Orders Passed U/S 263 Of The Act By The Ld. Pr.Cit, Nagpur- 2 Dated 17-02-2017 & 16-02-20217 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Respectively. The Grounds Of Raised By The Above Mentioned Assessees Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Atal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)
Section 143(3)Section 263

b) the order is passed allowing any relief without inquiring into the claim; (c) the order has not been made in accordance with any order, direction or instruction issued by the Board under section 119; or 24 Shri Mayur Khara vs Pr. CIT-2, Nagpur (d) the order has not been passed in accordance with any decision which is prejudicial

TAJSHREE AUTOWHEELS PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 400/NAG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur04 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Madhav VichoreFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(viib)

delay is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication on merits. 8. It is observed that the appellant has issued 2,00,000 shares each of face value Rs. 10/- to its existing shareholders on a premium of Rs.40/- per share. Thus, the issue price per share stands at Rs.50/-. As the appellant did not furnish any report

GAJANAND FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 126/NAG/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

condone the delay of 267 days in filing the present appeal and admit the same for adjudication on merit, as no mala fide intention can be ascribed to the assessee. 5. Facts in Brief:– The assessee is a Company engaged in financial activities. The assessee, on 30/09/2013, filed its return of income for the year under consideration declaring total loss

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

ITA 111/NAG/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

section 153A(1) read with „Expln-2‟; in absence of this, assessment made u/s153C would be invalid & is liable to be quashed; relied on Goldstone Cements Ltd (2023) (Gau HC); Fortune Vanijya (P) Ltd (2023) (Gau HC).” 40. In the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.111/Nag/ 2024, for the assessment year 2012-13 along with following additional ground

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

ITA 110/NAG/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

section 153A(1) read with „Expln-2‟; in absence of this, assessment made u/s153C would be invalid & is liable to be quashed; relied on Goldstone Cements Ltd (2023) (Gau HC); Fortune Vanijya (P) Ltd (2023) (Gau HC).” 40. In the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.111/Nag/ 2024, for the assessment year 2012-13 along with following additional ground

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

ITA 112/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

section 153A(1) read with „Expln-2‟; in absence of this, assessment made u/s153C would be invalid & is liable to be quashed; relied on Goldstone Cements Ltd (2023) (Gau HC); Fortune Vanijya (P) Ltd (2023) (Gau HC).” 40. In the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.111/Nag/ 2024, for the assessment year 2012-13 along with following additional ground

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

ITA 108/NAG/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Dec 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

section 153A(1) read with „Expln-2‟; in absence of this, assessment made u/s153C would be invalid & is liable to be quashed; relied on Goldstone Cements Ltd (2023) (Gau HC); Fortune Vanijya (P) Ltd (2023) (Gau HC).” 40. In the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.111/Nag/ 2024, for the assessment year 2012-13 along with following additional ground

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

ITA 109/NAG/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Dec 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

section 153A(1) read with „Expln-2‟; in absence of this, assessment made u/s153C would be invalid & is liable to be quashed; relied on Goldstone Cements Ltd (2023) (Gau HC); Fortune Vanijya (P) Ltd (2023) (Gau HC).” 40. In the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.111/Nag/ 2024, for the assessment year 2012-13 along with following additional ground

STELLAR REFRACTORIES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 165/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

MAHAVIR COAL WASHIERS PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 150/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

NARESH JAMPRASAD TIWARI,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 163/NAG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

ANKIT PULP & BOARDS PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 172/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

M/S. MINI IRON AND STEEL PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCEL-3, NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 131/NAG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

HERD MEDICAL FOUNDATION PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS, WARD-4(2), NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 139/NAG/2021[F.Y.2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

PREMCHAND KANHAIYALAL THAKUR,AMRAVATI vs. DCIT, CPC,, BENGALURU

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 110/NAG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

JAIKA VEHICLE TRADE PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/NAG/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

SHAMLAX METACHEM PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 100/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

HANSA CITY BUS SERVICES(NAGPUR) P LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 145/NAG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil

SUDARSHAN MOTORS,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR

In the result, the aforesaid appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 177/NAG/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh V. Loya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT–DR

B–3, Plot no.92, Near Gajanan Mandir …………… Appellant Wadgaon Road, Chandrapur 442 401 PAN – AAECD6247K v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Centralized Processing Centre ..…….………. Respondent Bengaluru 560 500 Assessee by : Shri Mahavir Atal, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Vitthal M. Bhosle, Jt. CIT–DR 18 ITA no.8/Nag./2022 (Assessment Year : 2019–20) M/s. Sudarshan Motors Kanoria House …………… Appellant Palm Road, Civil