M/S MANTHAN INC,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX CIRCLE, 19(2) MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2013-14 & Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Manthan Inc, Acit Cir. 19(2), Rani Bldg., V.P. Road, Tardeo, Vs. Mumbai-400 004. Mumbai. Pan No. Aakfm 6011 D Appellant Respondent : Assessee By Mr. Dilip Diwan, Ar Revenue By : Smt. Mahita Nair, Dr : Date Of Hearing 12/01/2023 : Date Of Pronouncement 19/01/2023

disallowed the deduction for donation made by the assessee of ₹30 lakhs to M/s Navjeevan Charitable Trust. 30 lakhs to M/s Navjeevan

JINSEVA FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appe

Bench: Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () & Smt. Renu Jauhri ()

disallowance of exemption u/s. mption u/s. 11 of the Act and cannot be a ground Act and cannot be a ground for rejection of registration u/s. 12A. for rejection of registration u/s. 12A. Ground - 4 4 - Without prejudice to the above, out of abundant Without prejudice to the above, out of abundant precaution and in good faith, the appellant

DY. COMMISSIONER O INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. SHREE SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST(SHIRDI), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

charitable and religious purpose, has incurred religious expenditure which is less than 5% of the total expenses of the Trust. In such a case, the trust may be eligible for certificate u/s 80G of the Act and at the same time would not be liable to be taxed for the anonymous donations received by virtue of Section 115BBC

SHREE SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST (SHIRDI),MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) 2(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

charitable and religious purpose, has incurred religious expenditure which is less than 5% of the total expenses of the Trust. In such a case, the trust may be eligible for certificate u/s 80G of the Act and at the same time would not be liable to be taxed for the anonymous donations received by virtue of Section 115BBC

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. SHREE SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST (SHIRDI), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

charitable and religious purpose, has incurred religious expenditure which is less than 5% of the total expenses of the Trust. In such a case, the trust may be eligible for certificate u/s 80G of the Act and at the same time would not be liable to be taxed for the anonymous donations received by virtue of Section 115BBC

DY. COMMISSIONER O INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. SHREE SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST(SHIRDI), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

charitable and religious purpose, has incurred religious expenditure which is less than 5% of the total expenses of the Trust. In such a case, the trust may be eligible for certificate u/s 80G of the Act and at the same time would not be liable to be taxed for the anonymous donations received by virtue of Section 115BBC

RAMKRISHNA BAJAJ CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 26(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am

trust. Accordingly, the assessment was completed on 28.03.2016 by making the aforesaid additions, thereby determining the total income of assessee at Rs. 2,99,17,200/- as the AO had disallowed the exemption under section10(34) of the IT Act claimed in respect of dividend income by the assessee. 4 Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable

NANDLAL TOLANI CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed is dismissed in the above terms

disallowed it based on the trust's exemption under Section 11.", "held": "The Tribunal held that the standard deduction under Section 24(a) for rental income cannot be allowed to a trust claiming exemption under Section 11. The income of such trusts is to be computed on commercial principles for application towards charitable

NANDLAL TOLANI CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ITO EXEM WARD 2(1), CUMBALLA HILL, MUMBAI

Charitable Trust appealed against the orders of the CIT(A) concerning AY 2014-15 and 2015-16. The core issue is the denial of a 30% standard deduction on rental income from property held by the trust. The assessee claimed this deduction under Section 24(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, while the Revenue disallowed

PUNJAB KESARI CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD 2(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the appellant is allowed in above terms

Bench: Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan, Jm Income Tax Officer (Exemption) – 2(2) Punjab Kesari Charitable Room No. 502, Trust, 5Th Floor, 242, Bhandar Galli, Vs. Piramal Chamber, L.J. Road, Mahim- 400016 Lalbaug- 400012, Mumbai. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatp0040R Assessee By : Shri. S. M. Kapoor Revenue By : Ms Madhu Malati Ghosh (Cit-Dr)

Charitable Trust; A.Y. 15-16 addition to fixed assets. Vide order sheet dated 14th December, 2017, the Authorized Representative of the assessee was asked as to why depreciation claimed by the trust should not be disallowed

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. SHREE SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST (SHIRDI), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the\nappeal of the Revenue is dismissed

charitable and religious trust, received anonymous donations. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment for AY 2013-14, believing income had escaped assessment under Section 115BBC of the Income Tax Act. The assessee challenged the reopening, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee also claimed deduction for accumulation of income under Section 11(2) on gross receipts, which

ESTATE OF VANDRAVAN P SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 19(3), MUMBAI

In the result all the three captioned appeals are dismissed

Bench: Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant ()

disallowance made by the Ld. AO of Rs.50,00,000/ Rs.50,00,000/- claimed u/s 35AC of the Act without appreciating claimed u/s 35AC of the Act without appreciating the following: - The 'Navjeevan Charitable Trust

M/S GOVINDRAM & CO.,MUMBAI vs. ASST. CIT 17(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11 is also dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

disallowing the claim made by the appellant and made an addition of Rs. 15,00,000/- to the income of the appellant on suspicion, surmises and conjectures. The case of M/s. Navjeevan Charitable Trust

M/S GOVINDRAM & CO.,MUMBAI vs. ASST. CIT 17(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11 is also dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

disallowing the claim made by the appellant and made an addition of Rs. 15,00,000/- to the income of the appellant on suspicion, surmises and conjectures. The case of M/s. Navjeevan Charitable Trust

PANDHI CHARITABLE TRUST ,MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanpandhi Charitable Trust Vs. Cit (Exemption) 303, Mint Chambers, 45/47, Mint R. No. 601, 6Th Floor, Cumballa Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Hill, Mtnl Te Building, Pan: Aaatp9226F Pedder Road, Dr. Gopalrao Deshmukh Marg, Cumballa Hill, Mumbai-400 026

Charitable Trust CIT(A), the assessee relied on the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Jamsetji Tata Trust (supra). The Ld. CIT(A) after considering that facts of instant case being identical to facts of Jamsetji Tata Trust (supra), he deleted the disallowance

PEGASUS PROPERTIES P. LTD.,PUNE vs. DY CIT, CC-2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

Charitable Trust. Accordingly, ground raised by the assessee is partly allowed. 23. Coming to Ground Nos. 14 and 15 which are in respect of Ad-hoc disallowance

DY.CIT (E) -2(1) , MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

Trusts Act confers a power upon the Charity Commissioner to suspend, remove or dismiss any Trustee/Trustees of ITA Nos. 1828 to 1831/Mum/2022 Mumbai Education Trust; A.Y. 08-09 to 11-12 the Public Trust if he/they are found guilty of the act/acts, which is/are mentioned in any of the Clauses (a) to (f) therein. In order to consider the question

DY.CIT (E) -2(1) , MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

Trusts Act confers a power upon the Charity Commissioner to suspend, remove or dismiss any Trustee/Trustees of ITA Nos. 1828 to 1831/Mum/2022 Mumbai Education Trust; A.Y. 08-09 to 11-12 the Public Trust if he/they are found guilty of the act/acts, which is/are mentioned in any of the Clauses (a) to (f) therein. In order to consider the question