ESTATE OF VANDRAVAN P SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 19(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to provide necessary documentary evidence and certificates to substantiate the eligibility of the donee institutions for deduction under Section 80GGA. Therefore, the claim for deduction was not sustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 35AC and Section 80GGA for donations made to certain trusts. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, treating the donations as non-genuine due to lack of proper documentation and eligibility certificates. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of the reassessment proceedings and the eligibility of the claimed deductions for donations made to charitable trusts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 35AC,Section 80GGA,Section 147,Section 148,Section 159
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Arvind Bhogilal v. CIT\n4 citing105 ITR 764 · 1976
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E” MUMBAI
Before: SANDEEP GOSAIN & SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
The captioned appeals are directed against separate orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) – National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2017-18 respectively.
In these appeals, the issue on merit relates to denial of deduction u/s 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). In assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13, the validity of the Estate of Vandravan P Shah Estate of Vandravan P Shah ITA No. 5401, 5402 & 5403/MUM/2024
reopening of the assessment as well as validity of th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 35AC
- Ramanand Kidarnath International, Mumbai vs Dy. CIT, Circle 26(1), MumbaiITA 99/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Jun 2026AY 2013-14
- Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 65/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed9 Jun 2026AY 2014-15
- Sushmita Kacholia, Mumbai vs DCIT, MumbaiITA 9443/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed5 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Mukut Behari Lal Bhargava, Gurgaon vs ACIT, Circle 3(1), GurgaonITA 2234/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
- Tulsi Trust, New Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, New DelhiITA 7217/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2025AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026