JINSEVA FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the mention of utilizing funds outside India in the MOA does not automatically warrant rejection of registration. It reasoned that such clauses can be interpreted as availing services from foreign counterparts for the benefit of people in India.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Jinseva Foundation, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, citing that the objects of the foundation allowed for utilization of funds outside India, which was considered a violation of Section 11.
What were the issues?
Whether the objects of a foundation allowing for utilization of funds outside India are grounds for rejection of registration under Section 12AB, and if such clauses can be interpreted differently.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- M.K. Nambyar Saarf Law Charitable Trust v. Union of India19 citing140 Taxmann 616 · 2004 · HC
- Dedhia Music Foundation v. CIT(E)11 citing173 Taxmann.com 394 · 2025
- National Informatics Centre Services Inc. v. DIT (Exemptions), New Delhi9 citing88 Taxmann.com 878 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI
Before: MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
PER RENU JAUHRI, AM
These two appeals by the assessee are directed against two separate order both dated 27.03.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions), Mumbai [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(E)’] for assessment year 2025-26 respectively.
The grounds raised by the assessee in ITA No. 3531/Mum/2025 are reproduced as under:
ITA Nos. 3531 & 2 3532/MUM/2025 Jinseva Foundation Jinseva Foundation
Ground - 1 - The Hon. CIT (Exemptions) on the facts and in the The Hon. CIT (Exemptions) on the facts and in the circumsta
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026