BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

225 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 12A(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune336Mumbai225Ahmedabad209Jaipur153Delhi136Chennai98Surat92Kolkata72Hyderabad61Rajkot60Bangalore54Amritsar39Nagpur27Indore24Chandigarh23Lucknow21Cochin21Visakhapatnam20Patna15Ranchi14Agra11Jodhpur11Panaji11Cuttack9Raipur7Jabalpur7Dehradun4Guwahati3Bombay2Allahabad2SC1

Key Topics

Section 12A504Section 12A(1)(ac)148Exemption98Section 80G90Section 1186Charitable Trust36Section 80G(5)28Section 1217Addition to Income17Natural Justice

NISHRIN BOOKWALA MEMORIAL CANCER AID TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) 2(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee

ITA 7889/MUM/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Feb 2026AY 2026-27

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Mr. Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Mr. Amol Kirtane, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

12A(1)(ac) (ac) of the Act a proviso has been inserted has been inserted by way of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 by way of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 with effect from 1/10 10/24 which authorise the Commissioner of /24 which authorise the Commissioner of Income-tax Exemption tax Exemption to condone delay in filing application in case

NISHRIN BOOKWALA MEMORIAL CANCER AID TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) 2(1), MUMBAI

Showing 1–20 of 225 · Page 1 of 12

...
17
Section 2(15)14
Limitation/Time-bar11

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee

ITA 7890/MUM/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Feb 2026AY 2026-27

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

For Appellant: Mr. Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Mr. Amol Kirtane, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

12A(1)(ac) (ac) of the Act a proviso has been inserted has been inserted by way of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 by way of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 with effect from 1/10 10/24 which authorise the Commissioner of /24 which authorise the Commissioner of Income-tax Exemption tax Exemption to condone delay in filing application in case

JINSEVA FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appe

ITA 3531/MUM/2025[2025-2026]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2025AY 2025-2026

Bench: Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () & Smt. Renu Jauhri ()

For Appellant: Mr. Margav Shukla
Section 11Section 12A

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall, section (1) of section 12A, shall,— (a) where the application is made under sub where the application is made under sub-clause (i) of the said clause, pass an order lause (i) of the said clause, pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five

RAAHAT HUMANITARIAN FOUDATION ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee i

ITA 4775/MUM/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Dec 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh () Assessment Year: 2024-25 Raahat Humanitarian Foundation, Cit (Exemptions), A 204, Zubaida Park, Behind Simla Room No. 601, 6Th Floor, Cumballa Hill Vs. Park, Old Mumbai Pune Road, Mtnl Te Building Pedder Road, Dr Kausa Mumbra, Gopalrao Deshmukh Marg, Thane-400612. Mumbai-400026. Pan No. Aaetr 9830 K Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Tanzil PadvekarFor Respondent: 17/12/2024
Section 11Section 12A

ac) of Raahat Humanitarian Foundation Raahat Humanitarian Foundation sub-section (1) of section 12A of section 12A for seeking provisional registration as seeking provisional registration as provided u/s 12AB(1)(c) of the Act. But contention of the assessee provided u/s 12AB(1)(c) of the Act. But contention of the assessee provided u/s 12AB(1

UMMEED FOUNDATION,AL SHAKREEN APT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PMT BUILDING COMMERCIAL COMPLEX

In the result, the grounds of the assessee are allowed for In the result, the grounds of the assessee are allowed for In the result, the grounds of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1876/MUM/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2023-24 Ummeed Foundation, Cit(E), Pune, Room No. 204, A1 Shakreen Apt, 322, 3Rd Floor, Income Tax Vs. Waf Acomplex Chs, H-104, Office, Pmt Building Sharifa Road, Amrut Nagar, City Commercial Complex, Shankar Convent High School, Thane, Sheth Road, Swargate, Kausa B.O., Maharashtra-400612. Pune-411037. Pan No. Aaatu 4914 H Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Ankush Kapoor, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Mr. Rohan Dedhia
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Act, section (1) of section 12A of the Act, up to 30/09/2023. up to 30/09/2023. Thus, no further extension of time has been granted ther extension of time has been granted for application under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub for application under clause (iii) of first proviso

CHAMBER OF INDIAN CHARITABLE TRUSTS,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT/ COMM OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2169/MUM/2021[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Sept 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. Nos. 2168 & 2169/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2022-23) Chamber Of Indian बिधम/ Pcit Charitable Trusts Mumbai-400020. Vs. Gala No.328-332, Linkway Estates, New Link Road, Malad (W), Mumbai- 400064. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaicc9627J (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & Mr. Sukhsagar Syal. Revenue By: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 04/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28/09/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Trust Against The Imposition Of Certain Impugned Conditions In The Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(E), Mumbai Dated 24.09.2021 & 24.05.2021, Whereby The Ld. Cit(E) Granted Registration U/S 12Ab(1)(A) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”) & Under Clause (Iii) Of The Second Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Act

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & MrFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. AR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

Charitable Trust he took us through the relevant provision, i.e. clause )a( of section 12AB)1( which provides as under- “12AB – Procedure for fresh registration (1) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on receipt of an application made under clause (ac) of sub- section (1) of section 12A

CHAMBER OF INDIAN CHARITABLE TRUSTS,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT/ COMM OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2168/MUM/2021[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Sept 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. Nos. 2168 & 2169/Mum/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2022-23) Chamber Of Indian बिधम/ Pcit Charitable Trusts Mumbai-400020. Vs. Gala No.328-332, Linkway Estates, New Link Road, Malad (W), Mumbai- 400064. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaicc9627J (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & Mr. Sukhsagar Syal. Revenue By: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 04/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28/09/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Trust Against The Imposition Of Certain Impugned Conditions In The Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(E), Mumbai Dated 24.09.2021 & 24.05.2021, Whereby The Ld. Cit(E) Granted Registration U/S 12Ab(1)(A) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”) & Under Clause (Iii) Of The Second Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Act

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala & MrFor Respondent: Shri Nihar Samal (Sr. AR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

Charitable Trust he took us through the relevant provision, i.e. clause )a( of section 12AB)1( which provides as under- “12AB – Procedure for fresh registration (1) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on receipt of an application made under clause (ac) of sub- section (1) of section 12A

D K AJMERA FOUNDATION TRUST,MUMBAI-400077 vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1279/MUM/2022[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Sept 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Us Also Falls Within The Covid Period. Pursuant To The Relaxation Granted By The Hon’Ble Supreme Court, We Are Inclined To Condone The Delay In Filing Of The Appeals By The Assessee & Admit The Same For Adjudication.

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable Trust and granted registration u/s.12A of the Act vide Registration No.TR/27137 dated 11/08/1989 and registered u/s.80G of the Act vide Registration No. DITE/MC/80G/502/2008/2008-09 dated 07/11/2008. The assessee trust made an application on 29/04/2021 in Form No.10A for registration as per Section 12A(1)(ac

D K AJMERA FOUNDATION TRUST,MUMBAI-400077 vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1281/MUM/2022[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Sept 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Us Also Falls Within The Covid Period. Pursuant To The Relaxation Granted By The Hon’Ble Supreme Court, We Are Inclined To Condone The Delay In Filing Of The Appeals By The Assessee & Admit The Same For Adjudication.

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable Trust and granted registration u/s.12A of the Act vide Registration No.TR/27137 dated 11/08/1989 and registered u/s.80G of the Act vide Registration No. DITE/MC/80G/502/2008/2008-09 dated 07/11/2008. The assessee trust made an application on 29/04/2021 in Form No.10A for registration as per Section 12A(1)(ac

BHAKTI TRUST,MUMBAI-400088 vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1282/MUM/2022[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Aug 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri N.B. GandhiFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade
Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(a)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

trust or institution for a period of 3 years from the assessment year from which registration is sought. However, the said section is applicable in cases where application is made under section 12A(1)(ac)(iv) of the Act. It is also not disputed that the Provisional Registration would be granted for a period of 3 years to the charitable

SAIFEE BURHANI UPLIFETMENT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION)-2, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1305/MUM/2021[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2022AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Tanzil PadvekarFor Respondent: Shri B.K. Bagchi, Sr. AR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

12A(1)(ac)(i) of the Act, the Principal Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust ITA No.1305/Mum./2021 Commissioner or Commissioner is required to pass an order registering the trust for a period of 5 years under section 12AB(1)(a) of the Act. However, Provisional Registration was granted in From 10 AC, which is granted to new charitable

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)-1(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. ALL INDIA GEM AND JEWELLERY DOMESTIC COUNCIL, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4652/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2015-16

For Respondent: Mr. Firoz Andhyarujina
Section 11Section 2(15)

ac large. Thus, it is not a charitable organization and its activities are in tivities are in the nature of business activities, hit by the 1st proviso to section 2(15) of the nature of business activities, hit by the 1st proviso to section 2(15) of the nature of business activities, hit by the 1st proviso to section

DEDHIA MUSIC FOUNDATION ,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXMPTION), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed

ITA 743/MUM/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Aditya AjgaonkarFor Respondent: Smt. Sanyogita Nagpal, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 8Section 80G

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall,— (a) where the application is made under sub-clause (i) of the said clause, pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five years; (b) where the application is made under sub-clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) or sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause

DEDHIA MUSIC FOUNDATION ,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXMPTION), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed

ITA 744/MUM/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Aditya AjgaonkarFor Respondent: Smt. Sanyogita Nagpal, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 8Section 80G

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall,— (a) where the application is made under sub-clause (i) of the said clause, pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five years; (b) where the application is made under sub-clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) or sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause

MS. ANAGHA AMAR AINAPURE,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 2664/Mum/2024 is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2614/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya - CAFor Respondent: Shri Dr. Kishor Dhule - CITDR)
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

ac)(iv) of the Act. It is also not disputed that the Provisional Registration would be granted for a period of 3 years to the charitable institutions which are yet to start their activities. However, in the present case, the assessee trust was already holding certificate dated11/08/1989 issued under section 12A of the Act. We find that section 12AB(1

SHALEM ASSEMBLIES OF GOD MISSION,MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA 2664/Mum/2024 is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2664/MUM/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Aug 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Br Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya - CAFor Respondent: Shri Dr. Kishor Dhule - CITDR)
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

ac)(iv) of the Act. It is also not disputed that the Provisional Registration would be granted for a period of 3 years to the charitable institutions which are yet to start their activities. However, in the present case, the assessee trust was already holding certificate dated11/08/1989 issued under section 12A of the Act. We find that section 12AB(1

ADVAYA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (NOW BTG ADVAYA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION),MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI , MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6809/MUM/2025[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Dr. K. Shivaram & Shri Rahul Hakani,ARsFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav (CIT-DR)
Section 12ASection 8

Trust was incorporated on 18/06/2015, and therefore was an existing charitable P a g e | 8 A.Y. - NA Advaya Charitable Foundation (Now BTG Advaya Charitable Foundation) organisation at the time of filing. However, due to an inadvertent and bona fide error, the incorrect section code was selected-Section 12A(1)(ac

LIKEMINDED EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) , MUMBAI

In the result, both appeals by the assessee are allowed\nfor statistical purposes

ITA 2647/MUM/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2025
Section 11Section 11(1)(c)Section 12A

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall,--\na) where the application is made under sub-clause (i) of the said clause, pass an\norder in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five years;\nb) where the application is made under sub-clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) or sub-\nclause (iv) or sub-clause

M/S. LIKEMINDED EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

In the result, both appeals by the assessee are allowed\nfor statistical purposes

ITA 2648/MUM/2025[NA.]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2025
For Respondent: \nvs
Section 11Section 11(1)(c)Section 12A

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall, --\na) where the application is made under sub-clause (i) of the said clause, pass an\norder in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five years;\nb) where the application is made under sub-clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) or sub-\nclause (iv) or sub-clause

TATA EDUCATION AND DEVEOPMENT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(EXP)-2(1) NOW ASSESSED BY DCIT (EXEMPTIONS)-2(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 1423/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2020AY 2011-12
Section 11Section 11(1)(c)Section 12A

trust or the establishment ITA Nos 1423, 1424 and 1535/Mum/2018 Assessment years: 2011-12 and 2012-13 Page 26 of 51 of the institution” is also provided for in Section 12A(1)(a), and exception to the said time frame are set out in section 12A(1)(ac). A reference is then made to proviso to Section 80HHD(4) which