Facts
The assessee, Advaya Charitable Foundation, filed an application for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but it was rejected by the CIT(E) due to a delay in filing. The assessee contended that the delay was due to a bona fide oversight by their tax consultant and that they had inadvertently selected the wrong section code for their application. The appeals were heard together as the issues were common.
Held
The Tribunal held that while the application was indeed filed beyond the prescribed time limit, the delay was not deliberate and was due to a bonafide mistake. The Tribunal noted that the legislature has introduced a proviso allowing CIT(E) to condone delays if reasonable cause is shown. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee to file a condonation application.
Key Issues
The primary issue was whether the delay in filing the application for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be condoned. A secondary issue was whether the rejection of the application for approval under Section 80G was justified.
Sections Cited
12AB, 80G, 12A(1)(ac), 12A(1)(ac)(iii), 12A(1)(ac)(vi), 12A(1)(ac)(i), 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(A), 10A, 10AC, 10AD, 80G(5)(i), 11, 12, 23AA, 23C of section 10
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
आदेश की प्रतितलतप अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
P a g e | A.Y. - NA Advaya Charitable Foundation (Now BTG Advaya Charitable Foundation) 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आय क्त / CIT 4. दिभागीय प्रदिदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. सत्यादपि प्रदि //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अतिकरण/ ITAT, Bench, Mumbai.