BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

148 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Pclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai148Bangalore61Pune35Raipur30Delhi26Chennai24Ahmedabad23Kolkata20Visakhapatnam18Jaipur12Nagpur9Lucknow9Cochin8Surat7Karnataka6Jabalpur4Jodhpur4Chandigarh3Panaji2Indore2Amritsar1Kerala1Hyderabad1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 194A243Section 201(1)210Section 194A(3)(v)191Section 2(19)115Section 201109TDS84Section 80P(2)(d)75Section 25070Exemption61Section 14A

DHANVARSHA NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA LIMITED,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 28(1)(3), NAVI MUMBAI

ITA 1599/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

80P(2)(d) of\nthe Income Tax Act, 1961 to the appellant-Society saying that\nit is interest earned on surplus fund kept with co-operative\nbanks and not in other Co-operative Societies.\n3.\nTreating the income of Rs.36,52,853/- as income from other\nsources u/s 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961\n4.\nCIT(A) has erred

DHANVARSHA NAGRI SAHAKARI PATASANTHA LIMITED,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 28(1)(3), NAVI MUMBAI

Showing 1–20 of 148 · Page 1 of 8

...
58
Deduction30
Disallowance20

Accordingly, in view of paragraph 10 to 15 above, disallowance of INR.32,63,969/- is deleted and claim of deduction under Section 80P of the Act as made by the Appellant is allowed

ITA 1600/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: the Tribunal. Therefore, the delay of 22 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 4. We note that the Appellant has raised the following grounds in the

For Appellant: Shri Vijaykumar ShindeFor Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 3. There was delay of 22 days in filing the appeal on account of medical issues faced by the chairman of the Appellant/Co- operative Society. Copy of medical reports were placed on record along with affidavit filed with application seeking condonation of delay

MAKER TOWER F PREMISES CO-OP SOC. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX - CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1362/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jul 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Ms Vasanti PatelFor Respondent: Shri Surendra Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80P(2)(d)

TDS to be deducted at the time of payment/credit of interest to the account of the payee, provided other conditions as laid down in the section are satisfied. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the assessee is also entitled to claim deduction under section 80P

M/S RENUKAMATA MULTI STATE CO-OP. URBAN CREDITN SOC. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. THE ASSTT. CIT, CC-4(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed, while the\nappeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1726/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

80P(4) of the Act. Further,\nNBFC shall have the meaning as assigned to it in section 45-I(f) of the Reserve\nBank of India Act, 1935.\n25. On the other hand, it is undisputed that the assessee is a co-operative\ncredit society and is a registered Multi-State Co-operative Urban Credit Society\nestablished under the Multi

JCIT (OSD), CC-4(4), MUMBAI vs. M/S. SHRI RENUKAMATA MULTI-STATE COOPERATIVE URBAN CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., AHAMEDNAGAR

ITA 2078/MUM/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

80P(4) of the Act. Further,\nNBFC shall have the meaning as assigned to it in section 45-I(f) of the Reserve\nBank of India Act, 1935.\n25. On the other hand, it is undisputed that the assessee is a co-operative\ncredit society and is a registered Multi-State Co-operative Urban Credit Society\nestablished under the Multi

SHRI RENUKAMATA MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(4), MUMBAI

ITA 1727/MUM/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

80P(4) of the Act. Further,\nNBFC shall have the meaning as assigned to it in section 45-I(f) of the Reserve\nBank of India Act, 1935.\n25. On the other hand, it is undisputed that the assessee is a co-operative\ncredit society and is a registered Multi-State Co-operative Urban Credit Society\nestablished under the Multi

M/S RENUKAMATA MULTI STATE CO-OP. URBAN CREDITN SOC. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. THE ASSTT. CIT, CC-4(4), MUMBAI

ITA 1725/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

80P(4) of the Act. Further,\nNBFC shall have the meaning as assigned to it in section 45-I(f) of the Reserve\nBank of India Act, 1935.\n\n25. On the other hand, it is undisputed that the assessee is a co-operative\ncredit society and is a registered Multi-State Co-operative Urban Credit Society\nestablished under

PREMIUM TOWER CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 24(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2436/MUM/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 250Section 80Section 80P(2)(d)

section 80P(2)(d) would not apply on the facts of that case. However, as noted above in one of the judgment, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court has held the same issue in favour of the assessee. 11. Therefore, following the judgment of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Totagars Cooperative Sale Society

MARIGOLD MERIDIAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 9072/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rahul Chaudhary & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(19)Section 250Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

80P(2)(d) is a debatable and adjudicatory issue, which cannot be adjusted in an intimation under Section 143(1). 8. Failure to Consider Disclosures and Supporting Evidence The CIT(A) erred by failing to appreciate that the assessee had duly disclosed the interest income, TDS

MARIGOLD MERIDIAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD-41(2)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 9070/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rahul Chaudhary & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(19)Section 250Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

80P(2)(d) is a debatable and adjudicatory issue, which cannot be adjusted in an intimation under Section 143(1). 8. Failure to Consider Disclosures and Supporting Evidence The CIT(A) erred by failing to appreciate that the assessee had duly disclosed the interest income, TDS

MARIGOLD MERIDIAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD-41(2)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 9071/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Rahul Chaudhary & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(19)Section 250Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

80P(2)(d) is a debatable and adjudicatory issue, which cannot be adjusted in an intimation under Section 143(1). 8. Failure to Consider Disclosures and Supporting Evidence The CIT(A) erred by failing to appreciate that the assessee had duly disclosed the interest income, TDS

JCIT (OSD), CC-4(4), MUMBAI vs. M/S. SHRI RENUKAMATA MULTI-STATE COOPERATIVE URBAN CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., AHAMEDNAGAR

ITA 2076/MUM/2023[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

80P(4) of the Act. Further, NBFC shall have the meaning as assigned to it in section 45-I(f) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1935. 25. On the other hand, it is undisputed that the assessee is a co-operative credit society and is a registered Multi-State Co-operative Urban Credit Society established under the Multi

JCIT (OSD), CC-4(4), MUMBAI vs. M/S. SHRI RENUKAMATA MULTI-STATE COOPERATIVE URBAN CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., AHAMEDNAGAR

ITA 2077/MUM/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra KansaraFor Respondent: Ms. Mahita Nair
Section 142Section 153DSection 250Section 68

80P(4) of the Act. Further, NBFC shall have the meaning as assigned to it in section 45-I(f) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1935. 25. On the other hand, it is undisputed that the assessee is a co-operative credit society and is a registered Multi-State Co-operative Urban Credit Society established under the Multi

CIDCO EMPLOYEES CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. WARD 28(1)(3), NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 700/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Aug 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Gagan Goyalcidco Employees Co-Op. Credit Society, Ground Floor, Cidco Bhavan, Cbd Belapur, Navi Mumbai – 400 614 Pan:Aaaac2203N ..... Appellant Vs. Ito Ward 28(1) (3)/ Nfac Delhi ..... Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri H. M. Bhatt, Ld. DR
Section 143Section 234BSection 250Section 271(1)Section 80Section 80P

section 80P. Resultantly the deduction claims of the Assessee for Rs. 60, 61,597/- was denied and added back to the Assessee’s taxable income. ii) The Ld. Assessing Officer on the issue of payment on account of professional fees of Rs. 59,200/- claimed by the Assessee in the P&L Account held that since the Assessee

PALM COURT M PREMISES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT - 30, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 561/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh () & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40Section 80P(2)(d)

section 80P(2)(d) and on TDS payments and thereby to frame the assessment de novo in accordance with law. Aggrieved

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (AMBOLI BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO(TDS) 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6421/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": ["Section 194A", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 80P(2)(d)", "Section 271C", "Section 139"], "issues

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ,(CHEMBUR BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6419/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs.10,000/-.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": ["Section 194A", "Section 201", "Section 250", "Section 80P(2)(d)", "Section

ACIT 23(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S THE SALSETTE CATHOLIC CO-OP. HOUSING LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is for the A

ITA 3870/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Shri T.S. Khalsa
Section 194ASection 2(19)Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

TDS. The Assessing Officer vide his letter dated 2nd March 2016, sought explanation from the assessee as to why the deduction claimed should not be disallowed and added back to the total income in view of the provisions of section 80P

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (BYCULLA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6424/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": [ "Section 194A(1)", "Section 194A(3)(i)(b)", "Section 194A(3)(v)", "Section 194A(3)(viia)(b)", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 271C", "Section 80P

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (KULA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6434/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": [ "Section 194A", "Section 250", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 194A(3)(v)", "Section 194A(3)(i)(b)", "Section 194A(3)(viia)(b)", "Section 80P