LATE SHRI JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN , KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

20. Even in absence of section 200A of the Act with introduction of section 234E, it was always open for the Revenue to demand and collect the fee for late filing of the statements. Section 200A would merely regulate the manner in which the computation of such fee would be made and demand raised. In other words, we cannot subscribe

LATE JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN, KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

20. Even in absence of section 200A of the Act with introduction of section 234E, it was always open for the Revenue to demand and collect the fee for late filing of the statements. Section 200A would merely regulate the manner in which the computation of such fee would be made and demand raised. In other words, we cannot subscribe

NATIONAL LAMINATE CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. CPC (TDS), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

TDS after 01.07.2012. 19. Hence, it can be said that, the mechanism provided for enforceability of Section 200(3) or 206C (3) for filing of the statement by making it penal under Section 272A (2) (k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament

LAWMEN CONCEPTS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-CPC-TDS , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

TDS after 01.07.2012. 19. Hence, it can be said that, the mechanism provided for enforceability of Section 200(3) or 206C (3) for filing of the statement by making it penal under Section 272A (2) (k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ( BORIVILI BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the results, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

TDS. The ld. AR's contention that since section 194A(3)(v) exempt any interest paid by co-operative society to its members irrespective of nature of deposit or amount, the action of the assessee society engaged in banking, not to deduct Tax at source is valid, is according to us not correct and it may be noted that section

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ( KURLA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the results, all the appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

TDS. The ld. AR's contention that\nsince section 194A(3)(v) exempt any interest paid by co-operative\nsociety to its members irrespective of nature of deposit or amount, the\naction of the assessee society engaged in banking, not to deduct Tax at\nsource is valid, is according to us not correct and it may be noted\nthat section

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (MALAD BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the results, all the appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

TDS. The ld. AR's contention that\nsince section 194A(3)(v) exempt any interest paid by co-operative\nsociety to its members irrespective of nature of deposit or amount, the\naction of the assessee society engaged in banking, not to deduct Tax at\nsource is valid, is according to us not correct and it may be noted\nthat section

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (TURNER ROAD BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the results, all the appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

TDS. The ld. AR's contention that\nsince section 194A(3)(v) exempt any interest paid by co-operative\nsociety to its members irrespective of nature of deposit or amount, the\naction of the assessee society engaged in banking, not to deduct Tax at\nsource is valid, is according to us not correct and it may be noted\nthat section

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (SANTACRUZ BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 1 (1)(4), MUMBAI

In the results, all the appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

TDS. The ld. AR's contention that\nsince section 194A(3)(v) exempt any interest paid by co-operative\nsociety to its members irrespective of nature of deposit or amount, the\naction of the assessee society engaged in banking, not to deduct Tax at\nsource is valid, is according to us not correct and it may be noted\nthat section

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (WADALA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)4, MUMBAI

In the results, all the appeals of the assessee are\ndismissed

TDS. The ld. AR's contention that\nsince section 194A(3)(v) exempt any interest paid by co-operative\nsociety to its members irrespective of nature of deposit or amount, the\naction of the assessee society engaged in banking, not to deduct Tax at\nsource is valid, is according to us not correct and it may be noted\nthat section

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (HILL ROAD BRANCH) ,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (AMBOLI BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (VAKOLA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ,(CHEMBUR BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERTIVE BANK LIMITED (COLABA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest

CITIZEN CREDIT CO.OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4),, MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (HILL ROAD BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest

CITIZEN CREDIT CO.OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4),, MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

TDS. 8.3 The provisions contained in section 194A, to the extent relevant for the instant appeal, read as under: “[Interest other than “Interest on securities”. 194A. (1) Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of interest other than income by way of interest