BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

91 results for “bogus purchases”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai573Delhi126Ahmedabad105Kolkata91Jaipur84Indore47Hyderabad33Pune32Chandigarh31Guwahati29Rajkot23Surat23Ranchi13Raipur12Lucknow12Visakhapatnam10Chennai10Cuttack10Nagpur10Patna7Jodhpur7Bangalore7Amritsar7Varanasi5Supreme Court1Panaji1Agra1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 148150Section 147123Addition to Income69Penny Stock59Section 6852Section 143(3)50Section 10(38)44Section 25036Section 143(2)28Long Term Capital Gains

RAIGARH JUTE & TEXTILE MILLS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-8(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2286/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A No.2286/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Raigarh Jute & Textile Mills Ltd...................................................……Appellant 36, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata-700071. [Pan: Aabcr2034B] Vs. Acit, Circle-8(2), Kolkata...............................……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : May 16, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 27, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यकसद"य"वारा/ Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 13.03.2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1 That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A)- 15 Erred In Holding That The Assessing Officer Was Justified In Disallowing & Adding Back The Appellant'S Claim For Deduction Of Loss Suffered Of Rs.4,02,00,360/- Suffered By The Appellant In Its Share Trading Business. 2 That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A)-15 Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Assessing Officer Of Invoking The

Section 14ASection 250

bogus long-term capital gain/loss. That these companies were still existent companies and their shares were being traded upon the stock exchange. That even the financials of these companies did not suggest that these were penny stock companies. That though certain investigations were carried on by Security Exchange Board of India and during investigation, the trading by 14 noticees

Showing 1–20 of 91 · Page 1 of 5

25
Section 26324
Disallowance23

NAVANSH VINIMAY PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 8(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 724/KOL/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 May 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250

bogus LTCG/STCLI Trading loss etc. as per requirement to various beneficiaries. It has been found from the trade ledger of the scrip that the assessee is one of such beneficiaries and transacted in the stated penny stock as stated above and received sale proceeds amounting to Rs, 63,76,485/-. The assessee has been asked to submit the purchase

PRATIK AGARWAL BENEFICIARY TRUST ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, C.C.-3(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee(s) are allowed as per the terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 2068/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 250

bogus LTCG is claimed for dealing in Page 5 of 74 I.T.A. Nos.: 982, 983, 984 & 2068/KOL/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd. M/s. Nishit Agarwal Beneficiary Trust Pinky Agarwal Pratik Agarwal Beneficiary Trust penny stock. For reference, we reproduce the finding of ld. CIT(A) in the case of M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd.: “6. After

PINKY AGARWAL ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee(s) are allowed as per the terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 984/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 250

bogus LTCG is claimed for dealing in Page 5 of 74 I.T.A. Nos.: 982, 983, 984 & 2068/KOL/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd. M/s. Nishit Agarwal Beneficiary Trust Pinky Agarwal Pratik Agarwal Beneficiary Trust penny stock. For reference, we reproduce the finding of ld. CIT(A) in the case of M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd.: “6. After

M/S. NISHIT AGARWAL BENEFICIARY TRUST ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC - 3(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee(s) are allowed as per the terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 983/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 250

bogus LTCG is claimed for dealing in Page 5 of 74 I.T.A. Nos.: 982, 983, 984 & 2068/KOL/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd. M/s. Nishit Agarwal Beneficiary Trust Pinky Agarwal Pratik Agarwal Beneficiary Trust penny stock. For reference, we reproduce the finding of ld. CIT(A) in the case of M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd.: “6. After

M/S. GATEWAY FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CC - 3(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee(s) are allowed as per the terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 982/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 250

bogus LTCG is claimed for dealing in Page 5 of 74 I.T.A. Nos.: 982, 983, 984 & 2068/KOL/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd. M/s. Nishit Agarwal Beneficiary Trust Pinky Agarwal Pratik Agarwal Beneficiary Trust penny stock. For reference, we reproduce the finding of ld. CIT(A) in the case of M/s. Gateway Financial Services Ltd.: “6. After

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3.1, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1436/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2016-17
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1515/KOL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1),, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1591/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

D.C.I.T., CC - 3(1),, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1541/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1560/KOL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1198/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2021-2022
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 931/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2019-2020
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1197/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2020-2021
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1561/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CC - 3(3),, KOLKATA

ITA 1195/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1194/KOL/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2016-2017
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), KOLKATA

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1196/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2018-2019
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

penny stocks, concept of working backwards.\nThis is a very significant factor to be remembered. Therefore,\nthere has been absolute anonymity of the assessee in the\nprocess of investigation. The endeavour of the department is to\nexamine the \"modus operandi\" adopted and in that process now\nseek to identify the assessees who have benefited on account\nof such \"modus operandi

MEGAPODE VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 99/KOL/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2013-2014

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rites Goel, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

penny stock company. When the assessee was show caused that why not the alleged loss be treated as bogus, assessee replied that they have traded in the equity shares of BCSL and CCLII through registered brokers on the recognized stock exchange and that there was no such restriction on trading of these two companies. However, the learned Assessing Officer treated

MEGAPODE VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 100/KOL/2023[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rites Goel, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

penny stock company. When the assessee was show caused that why not the alleged loss be treated as bogus, assessee replied that they have traded in the equity shares of BCSL and CCLII through registered brokers on the recognized stock exchange and that there was no such restriction on trading of these two companies. However, the learned Assessing Officer treated