SHRI NARSHING BINDAL,DEWAS vs. ACIT 1(1), UJJAIN

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Narsingh Bindal, Acit-1(1) 154, M.G. Road, Kannod, Ujjain बनाम/ Dewas Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Ajhpb 1234 B Assessee By Shri R.S. Dave, Adv. Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 09.01.2023

section u/s 145(3) of the Act and rejected books of accounts. Thereafter, the Ld. AO estimated the business income of assessee at Rs. 55,74,215/- and after deducting the net profit of Rs. 24,63,665/- from business declared by assessee in return, determined additional business income of Rs. 31,10,550/- and made addition. When the issue

M/S CUMMINS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,DEWAS vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), UJJAIN

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanicummins Technologies Acit Circle -1(1) India Pvt. Ltd. Ujjain Industrial Area No.2 A.B. Vs. Road Industrial Area Dewas (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabct2018B Assessee By Shri Ketan K. Ved. Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 25.08.2023

depreciation allowance or any other allowance under this Act has been computed." 15- In light of the aforesaid statutory provision, in the present case, notice has been served within six years from the end of the relevant assessment year and the tax effect is in crores of rupees and therefore, the Assessing Officer was justified in initiating proceedings

M/S RADHISHWARI DEVLOPERS P LTD,INDORE vs. PR CIT -2 INDORE, INDORE

In the result, Assessee’s appeal in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year 2013-14 M/S. Radhishwari Developers P. Ltd. (Now Known As R.C. Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. ) Indore : Appellant Pan :Aafcr1916A V/S Pr. Cito-2 : Respondent Indore Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema Sr. Adv. With Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar Advs. Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 24.05.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 20.07.2021

depreciation at Rs.1,53,066/- to be carry forward for set up in subsequent years. 3. After passing of the assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act, Ld. Pr. CIT examined the assessment records and documents filed by the assessee and notice that the M/s. Radheshwari Developers Pvt. Ltd. assessment order is prima facie, erroneous and prejudicial

ACIT-1(1), INDORE vs. KRITI NUTRIENTS LIMITED, INDORE

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

145(2) could not be\ninvoked,".\nCIT vs. Anand Kumar\nModi (2015) 2 ITJ\nOnline 668\n(Jharkhand)\nHeld that “addition made after rejecting books\nmaintained by assessee should be deleted when\nall quantitative details were available in hooks\nof account and account and accounts were regularly\nmaintained”.\nPr. Commissioner of\nIncome tax vs. Forum\nSales Pvt. Ltd (2024)\n468

M/S BANSAL EXTRACTION & EXPORT P LTD,BHOPAL vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyaniit(Ss)A No. 82/Ind/2020 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dcit (Central)-1 M/S. Bansal Extraction & बनाम/ Bhopal Exports (P) Ltd., Bhopal Vs. (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee) Pan: Aadcb 7521 M

depreciation on extra cost of construction added by AO as per report of VO(P&M) is not allowable to assessee under the provisions of Act as addition on account of undisclosed investment has been made u/s 69B of the Act.” Revenue’s IT(SS)A No. 82/Ind/2020 and Assessee’s Ground No. 1 & 2 in ITA No. 172/Ind/2020

CHANDUMAL THAWARI,BETUL vs. JCIT RANGE-2, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2010-11

section 145 and rejected the book results and proceeded to estimate profit. The assessing officer adopted the average of gross profit of earlier two financial years and made addition of Rs.6,44,750/-. Further, the assessing officer made addition on account of low withdrawal for household expenses amounting to Rs.6,19,000/- but did not made separate additions as addition

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I, BHOPAL , BHOPAL vs. SOM DISTILLERIES PRIVATE LIMITED, BHOPAL

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 145 are applicable. The books of accounts are also not been rejected, hence the adhoc disallowance are wholly unlawful and unjustified. The assessee submits that the disallowance is neither justified nor lawful. From the perusal of the chart, the increase in mainly on account Page 32 of 54 Som Distilleries Private Limited I.T.A. Nos. 272 & 289/Ind/2023

SOM DISTILLERIES PVT. LTD.,BHOPAL vs. ITO-1(3), BHOPAL

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 145 are applicable. The books of accounts are also not been rejected, hence the adhoc disallowance are wholly unlawful and unjustified. The assessee submits that the disallowance is neither justified nor lawful. From the perusal of the chart, the increase in mainly on account Page 32 of 54 Som Distilleries Private Limited I.T.A. Nos. 272 & 289/Ind/2023